I am very certain about what the are, and when you need to be aware that you have changed frames.
An "event horizon" is the boundry of a large scale or major Inertial Reference frame, but are those the only ones?
Read carefully and answer the whole question.
Also, are there Inertial Reference Frames in a biological system?
ankitd
Favorite Answer
A fundamental principle of all physics is the equivalence of inertial reference frames. In practical terms, this equivalence means that scientists living inside an enclosed box moving uniformly cannot detect their motion by any experiment done exclusively inside the box.
By contrast, bodies are subject to so-called fictitious forces in non-inertial reference frames; that is, forces that result from the acceleration of the reference frame itself and not from any physical force acting on the body. Examples of fictitious forces are the centrifugal force and the Coriolis force in rotating reference frames.
therefore if a scientist tries to proove if the object is moving then he would fail or prove relativity theory wrong (which is absurd and impossible..).
Anonymous
The quantum leap of the event horizons you are referencing can best be described as the opposing forces running laterally alongside the main inertial advance of the continuum as it passes threw light that has been bent exactly 43.7 degrees from true horizontal adjusted for temperature variances plus or minus 2 degrees kelvin.
fleitman
hi I very in all probability that Einstein believed in God in case you leaf by ability of his biography. There are alot of scientist that position self assurance in God. notwithstanding, technology container calls for the scientist to make sure how issues ensue particularly then why. technology is only a device to assemble data for theories and ideas. It restricted with the help of mankinds own psychological means and actual limits. it gained't produce all solutions because we are restricted with the help of time. in the intervening time, we ought to continually understand that not all those who position self assurance in god are literally not logical or rational. i imagine you're refering to the electrons information which formerly were considered to be in fixed rotation notwithstanding it grew to grow to be out that they moved and skipped positions in the atoms rings. both quatum mechanics and newtons determinism locate it troublesome to describe this habit of the electrons, is its regrettably nevertheless a secret, we opt to do extra study, yet i think we ought to locate the answer in arithmetic. We spend to a lot time visualising atoms that i distracts us from know-how them. we are able to in no way extremely know what Enstein is relating till we ask Albert himself.
Don S
Einstein can
Anonymous
I CAN