Sit/Start...WR week 4?
Who do you think is the better choice for week 4 WR for each matchup (for separate leagues):
1. Marques Colston, No vs. Car. OR B. Edwards, Cle. vs. Oak.
2. Marques Colston, No vs. Car. OR B. Engram, Sea. vs. Chi
Who do you think is the better choice for week 4 WR for each matchup (for separate leagues):
1. Marques Colston, No vs. Car. OR B. Edwards, Cle. vs. Oak.
2. Marques Colston, No vs. Car. OR B. Engram, Sea. vs. Chi
crippler5511
Favorite Answer
Start Colston in both leagues.
stacks
This week, Edwards is the most valuable, followed by Colston, then Engram. Edwards is the definitive go-to guy in his offense, and the Raiders are simply horrid. Colston's matchup isn't great, but Engram is part of a 4 WR attack against a very good defense, both of which will contribute to lowering his looks. This makes him a pretty bad option.
Kizeman
I would honestly go with Colston in both. I have him on three of my four teams, and the only reason he's not starting in one of them is because I have Santana Moss and Keyshawn Johnson.
I am not quite sold on Edwards yet, and Engram isn't really a threat because the Bears secondary is really just that good. I do believe the Bears will have their hands full, but I don't expect Engram to really be a threat.
So, I would go with Marques Colston.
Anonymous
2
house6567
1. Edwards
2. Colston