Does our population prove Evolution wrong?

Favorite Answer

I think the FACT that nothing nor no one is still evolving proves that evolution is wrong....Show more

Population growth doesn't quite work like that. You're assuming that the population grew at a consistent rate over time. It hasn't.
The increase in the size of a population (such as the human population) is an example of exponential growth. The human population grew at the slow rate of only about 0.002 percent a year for the first several million years of our existence. Since then the average annual rate of human population has increased to an all-time high of 2.06 percent in 1970. As the base number of people undergoing growth has increased, it has taken less and less time to add each new billion people. It took 2 million years to add the first billion people; 130 years to add the second billion; 30 years to add the third billion; 15 years to add the fourth billion; and only 12 years to add the fifth billion. We are now approaching the sixth billion.

I am absolutely rebutting with verifiable facts. Look it up yourself....Show more

The plural of quantum will be quanta, no longer quanties. This bickering over the note concept is stupid. it really is even sillier once you employ it about evolution. the theory isn't evolution.. the theory is about the organic decision. that is called the theory of Evolution with the help of organic decision. as with all technological expertise each and every concept stands on the info that carry it up. in case you could teach to different scientists that the theory is incorrect purely so as that they could do your attempt and teach it to themselves that that is incorrect then that theory ought to get replaced to in positive condition any new info. Einstein's theories did precisely that to Newton's rules. Scientists discovered that at %'s drawing close the speed of light Newton's rules were no longer adequate to describe or predict the info. a medical concept is a hypothesis supported with the help of very a lot of evidence which stands the attempt of time, commonly examined and not in any respect rejected. note that the final public makes use of the note concept to advise a lack of expertise or a wager, purely the alternative of the medical meaning. Darwin's concept of evolution with the help of organic decision is an social gathering of a medical concept. It has survived medical scrutiny for more desirable than 100 thirty years and evidence to help it keeps to receive....Show more

I was going to go into a long counter to this argument, but I just don't have the energy. Here's a quick and dirty:

The relative levels of genetic diversity required to sustain the viability of the Human species is a gene pool about 10,000 strong. The amount of inbreeding that is the resultant of only 4 family lines interbreeding would creat so many deformities that the viability of the species is nil. Quite simply, no group less than a few thousand strong could repopulate the Earth....Show more

And what makes you think the population growth rate hasn't changed? People died more often back then. You had plague, no medicine, unsanitary conditions.

"The evolutionist has to believe mankind stayed primitive for millions of years at negligible population growth then about 5,000 years ago then he suddenly became civilised and the population started to grow"
-- More or less, yeah....Show more