which would be a faster hard drive setup?
option A
single seagate SATA 32 mb cache 500gb
option b
two seagate sata 16mb cache 250gb (stripped)
the cost between the two is nearly the same (give or take 10 bucks) I would think the stripped set is faster by a fair amount , but unless it is pretty noticable i would prefer the simplisity of one drive.
what are the experts thoughts.
PS i know a stripped set is less secure, but i have a single 250 gb ATA i am using for "storage" and it will be backed up, i am refering only for use for the main install drive for os and programs only.
the raid configuration would be controled from a on board raid controller.
o.k. all "data" such as music files ect, would be sotred on the 3rd dirve which is a old ata drive and that would be backed up. i am just curious about the difference in performance for a "boot disk" i mean what information would i losse if all important data is on a seperate drive?
also isn't 2x250 gb in a strip set, just as big as a single 500gb?