I've noticed a lot of answers get ratings that appear based on nothing more than agreement/disagreement, and not on the quality of answer. For example, if someone asks "How much will Hillary's health care plan really cost", people will offer answers such as "That lesbian want to turn America into the Soviet Union", and get a bunch of positive thumbs up, though it has nothing to do with the original question.
Could Answers make public who votes how? Might some feedback explaining why one got a thumbs down help people craft better answers? And could such public scrutiny lead to better actions on visitors parts, and keep Answers closer to what it was conceived as, rather than another political echo chamber?
(One thing I would like to note: I used a random example; such behavior is not confined to one ideology or the other, and I am not implying such).
Noah A2008-01-23T15:05:06Z
Favorite Answer
I have to agree with you. Most people here are biased when it comes to thumbing up or down. Someone can have the BEST ANSWER EVER and it can be disagreed upon by some individuals. People overlook the fact that the "thumbing" process is based on quality.
one million. Hell in a cellular suits can not be contested as a applicable adventure devoid of blood. Disagree, Hell In A cellular suits can nonetheless be tremendous if there's a pair of moments like somebody falling off the roof or crashing in the process the facet of the cellular 2. Undertaker vs facet at Wrestlemania 24 grew to become into overshadowed by aptitude's retirement. Disagree 3. WWE ought to hold back the Cruiserweight branch so adult men like Evan Bourne, Chavo Guerrero and Kofi Kingston can contend for the identify. Agree, Chavo profession has died and Evan Bourne isn't getting used marvelous. 4. It grew to become into no longer the marvelous time for AJ varieties to improve into the TNA international champion. i do no longer watch TNA 5. Wrestlemania will on no account ce the comparable devoid of Undertaker and HBK. top now, I tottatotallye previous, I disagree, Wrestlemania nonetheless had Hulk Hogan, Stone chilly, Bret Hart, The Rock, Eddie Guerrero and Chris Benoit. 6. Chris Benoit ought to be judged as a wrestler, no longer on his very own existence. Agree, He grew to become into an marvelous wrestler with a lot of tremendous moments. 7. Christian is dropping away on ECW and could be drafted to uncooked or Smackdown as quickly as plausible. Agree, i grew to become into finding forward to his return yet now that he's in ECW i'm no longer a lot of partial to him. 8. Nigel McGuiness could have a greater efficient WWE profession because of the fact he has greater aura. Who? 9. Hogan vs aptitude in Australia will destroy aptitude's retirement. Agree 10. Smackdown is the greater unique WWE instruct, yet uncooked remains categorised as WWE's flagship instruct. Agree, uncooked purely has DX for enterEntertainment I hate the hot DX. we've seen all of it in 2006 and 1998, this is purely boring now.
it doesn't matter if someone gives you a thumbs up or thumbs down. But if someone gives you a thumbs up you get a point and if they give you a thumbs down nothing happens.