Do you really believe the Arctic is melting as fast or faster than last year?

I've been checking this site 'Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps' every morning and here's the image for July 17, 2007 beside the image of July 17, 2008.

http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=07&fd=17&fy=2007&sm=07&sd=17&sy=2008

From this website:

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/

Can you really keep claiming that the Arctic is melting as fast as it did last year?

2008-07-18T04:52:11Z

None of you actually opened the link if you did, none of you would have said I believe it's melting faster.

2008-07-18T04:53:34Z

None of you actually opened the link if you did, none of you would have said I believe it's melting faster.

2008-07-18T04:56:05Z

I was thinking of that Yahoo Press release that claimed it was melting at a faster rate and could possibly be completely melted this summer.

2008-07-18T05:03:18Z

Manda the thumbs down was due to you not remembering the Yahoo article a couple weeks back that claimed the Arctic could possibly be completely ice free this year.

Don't you remember all the silliness the day that press release came out?

I just felt that some people on Yahoo Answers needed a wake up call when it came to their beliefs of what's happening in the Arctic this year. Since those images and the graph you and Jello provided clearly show that it's clearly not melting at the same rate it did last Summer. In fact at this rate the Arctic will gain even more ice volume this coming winter.

2008-07-18T05:42:14Z

Adam C - Did you open the first link I provided? The second was just to show this data comes from a site that promotes Global Warming, but yet also won't admit the Sea Ice is rebounding this year. Also that imaging data only goes to 2006.

2008-07-18T05:44:31Z

Adam I have looked at it across the years too, but I do feel looking at 2007 and 2008 day to day data is relevant since it shows the Ice isn't melting as fast as last year. And in fact will start to significantly gain ice this coming Winter.

2008-07-18T09:08:05Z

Panruge if you look at your graph again it only goes to 2007 since the 2008 Summer season isn't done yet.

2008-07-18T09:22:11Z

Pegminer - I realize most of the ice is new ice, but if we keep more ice than last year we will have a net positive going into the 2008-2009 Winter season so we will start gaining more multi year ice than last year.

I also don't understand why people are having a hard time comparing the pictures and looking at the graphic about the thickness of the ice. Dark purple is the thickest ice pack.

And the ocean is shaded dark blue. So it's easy to see that more ocean was open last year on July 17th than there is this year.

2008-07-18T10:16:28Z

Manda - We knew it was only speculation but the people who don't actually research this stuff, took the hook and swallowed it not even paying attention to all the words like possibly, might or maybe.

2008-07-18T10:25:10Z

Adam - I've been watching the changes on a daily basis to assess the melt compared to last year to see if we will have an uptick on the declining ice volume for the Arctic. I say at this halfway point that we will see a nice uptick on the sea ice volume graph that Pangrue pointed out without realizing that it only consisted of data through 2007.

And if we keep enough Ice this Summer it won't take as long as people think to get back up to what it was in 1980. Of course will have colder winters if we do get back to 1980 levels, but I guess you have to take the good with the bad.

(Good being I'm studying the right indicators of what will happen with the Global Average Temperature, the bad being living through cold, snowy Winters in Minnesota again.)

2008-07-18T12:50:27Z

Dana - Yes I could be premature if I made prediction of how much ice would melt in the Arctic halfway through the Summer. I just felt the halfway point would be good to show that so far the melt rate is less than last year. And will have to wait and see if the new ice that formed this Winter (Which I feel we should all agree was a colder Winter in the Arctic than the 2006-2007 season was.) is strong enough to hold up to the Summer sun. I really can't say heat, since how warm does it actually get in polar region during the Summer?

Dana19812008-07-18T11:39:13Z

Favorite Answer

Well really you're asking 2 seperate questions here.

1) Is the Arctic melting as fast or faster than last year?

So far, no.

http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png

2) Does this mean the predictions of an ice free Arctic this summer are wrong?

Not necessarily.

You're assuming that there's a constant melt rate, and if we're behind last year's rate, we'll end the summer behind last year's melt extent. However, it's not a constant rate.

A key piece of information you're neglecting is that because of last year's record melt, the ice present now is mostly 1st-year ice, thinner than was present before; as a result, the new ice is more vulnerable to melting during the summer heat. So it's entirely possible that the melting will accelerate and the Arctic could become ice free by the end of the summer. Only time will tell.

Members of the Polaris Project, for example, are split 4-to-2 against this year’s record breaking last year’s.

http://thepolarisproject.org/blog/?p=25

Nice graphic showing their predictions:

http://thepolarisproject.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/preds.png

Adam C2008-07-18T05:38:03Z

Hmmm...
I did open the links and the first thing I read on the Cryosphere site is "The animation shows the dramatic loss of multiyear sea ice over the past year"
So, your own link says the ice is 'dramatically' less...!

The other site is quite interesting although, of course, very coarse - the scale is huge, it cannot show volume, etc. In other words, there is no quantitative data such subjective, but yes, still useful...

IF you want to base your entire statistical evaluation of the state of the arctic and past and present trends of melting on the comparision of ONE day ONE year apart!!

So, thanks, interesting, but not relevant to the discussion.

If you don't get what I mean, try looking at these links (the exact same site just comparing different days) that clearly show that the ice cap has shrunk (I more or less picked these days at random).
http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=07&fd=17&fy=1979&sm=07&sd=17&sy=2008
http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=02&fd=17&fy=2007&sm=08&sd=17&sy=2007
http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=10&fd=17&fy=2001&sm=10&sd=17&sy=2007

We could play this game for many years if you like - but the point is that comparing two days tells us nothing!

Edit reply:
Yes, I did open the first link that's the point - by comparing July 17 2007 to July 17 2008, all we can say is that the area of surface ice coverage on July 17 2008 is greater than it was one year ago: It's only one day!

Did you open my links? They also compare one day to another (OK, ignore the second one, I was being a smarta**e there) and they show ice cover shrinking.

Whether the ice cover is greater or lesser from one year to the next is irrelevant - we need multiple points or averages:
It just isn't scientifically relevant to compare two points and try to extrapolate a trend backwards or forwards.

manda2008-07-18T04:51:40Z

Who claims it is melting as quickly as it did last year?

Although this graph shows only area and not volume, it is a pretty clear indication that this years' melting so far has not been as extensive as last years': http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png

It also shows there is less ice this year than what would be considered normal.

EDIT: How funny. I actually agree with Jello and I get a thumbs down while he gets a thumbs up. And I pointed out an obvious fact on the graph while he made a speculation.

EDIT: Actually, I DO remember when it was said the Arctic might be ice-free this year. That was speculation also.

pegminer2008-07-18T06:57:43Z

So far there is more ice coverage this year than last year's record low. It's a bit hard to judge from your image, but it's much clearer if you look at this plot

http://www.nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png

It is still substantially below the 1979-2000 average extent. A tougher question is whether the volume of sea ice is greater. It appears that there is more first-year ice this year so it is thinner and will melt faster. Check out this image

http://www.nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20080717_Figure5.png

Anyway, we'll find out in a couple of months--of course if you'll remember back a couple of months, people were trying to convince us how much ice there was compared to normal--not just compared to last year.

Dr Jello2008-07-18T04:51:50Z

There's no way anyone who is honest can make the claim that the ice is melting faster this year.

The melting of the Arctic ice has slowed considerably this summer. There's a good chance that when winter comes around the ice will start forming at a greater area than during the 1979-2000 average.

Show more answers (10)