A judge asked a good question in court about a wrongful adoption?

She asked the lawyer for a couple who will not give a baby back to the natural father. If some one kidnapped a baby and kept it for a year to you cont to let the child live with the kidnapper because the child bonded with them? What would your answer be? His was of course not that was illegal. But what is it called when a father from the beginning says he wants to raise his child and they take off with the child anyways.

2009-03-27T05:24:57Z

After 3 years my son is still fighting to raise his son. Just waiting on the judges to give their ruling. I have called it a kidnapping from the begining and that up sets some people. Finally a judge understands that you can't use best interest just because the post adopting couple hids the child with help of the adoption agency. I'm telling you father's in jail have had more rights than what my son had.
No news story on this story because the father in this story has no drug charges, DWI or prison time. He's to clean no dirt.

2009-03-27T10:33:38Z

SJM- I read that report and find it really up setting that we would live in a world where if some one saw your baby and wanted the child would be able to keep the child if they stay hidden for a year or two. Just explain to me how the child won't feel that his or her life was messed up by the kidnappers and have fears that when they get older it might happen to them. As with the case I'm talking about they want to blame the father because for the damage to the child just because he wanted his child just as a mother would want her baby.
This is going to be a landmark case no matter which way the judges order it. If the father get's his child (the child know and see his father almost every month and for the summer) Then just maybe these adoption agency and post adopted parents will step back and do what is right.
If he doesn'r get to raise his child then the adoption agencies, CPS and everyother agency will be able to use the bonding thing to strip the rights of the natural paren

Anonymous2009-03-27T06:52:36Z

Favorite Answer

Its legalized kidnapping.

What the heck is taking this judge so long to make his ruling.......does he/she need to experience having their own child kidnapped.

Sounds like the Aps fighting to hold your son's child hostage need to be locked up for a 30 day evaluation.

102

SJM2009-03-27T07:21:10Z

I recently read an article about kidnapping and the best interest of the child. The article served as further proof to me that psychology is devoid of all morals and ethics. I'm not a big fan of either psychology or the best interest dogma. It does directly address the judge's question. Actually, I think the 'best interest of the child' should be renamed, 'the best interest of psychological theory'. Unbelievably, this article suggests that the appropriate psychological position is to affirm that even if a child has been kidnapped, the best interest of the child may be to remain with the kidnappers. It's a crazy world we live in.

http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/30/2/196.pdf

71

?2016-10-25T17:19:00Z

You admit to going 40 5 in a 40 so that you have not got any protection He would not could reveal his overhead lighting fixtures on, they are activated to flow site visitors in an emergency He can grant you with a citation on your moms driveway. you could tell the choose something you want, state your case, the city lawyer will state the officials case. Whoever the choose believes will win. you may ask for a jury trial in case you want, then you easily could persuade 6 or 8 or 12 human beings.

00

Anonymous2009-03-26T22:02:19Z

Makes sense to me.

The father has just as much right to the child as the mother. Until and unless you can prove he is an unfit parent, the child is his.

This adoption should never have been finalized. It's irresponsible, and NOT in the best interest of the child.

If lawyers, case workers and everyone else had paid attention to details, and did their jobs, the baby wouldn't be suffering from being removed from the only parents he's ever known.

If those adoptive parents were thinking of anything else but getting their hands on a "womb wet" baby, they might have called the whole thing off and saved themselves this horror.

123

Gershom2009-03-26T22:43:08Z

kidnapping.

Thats simple to me. Calling it adoption doesn't take away the fact that the child was stolen and kept from his parents against the parents will.

*rolls eyes* when will people stop assuming legalized kidnapping is okay just because someone decides to call it adoption?

151
Show more answers (3)

Related Questions

At a traffic court, the judge asked the motorist: Tell me, why did you park your car here?black judge ask white lawyers to leave court room..?im representing myself in family court for access tosee my son what kind of questions will the judge ask?When Mayweather prove his innocence should he sue the court for wrongful imprisonment?Would you watch a Court show if Paris Hilton was the Judge?

Trending Questions

Is the process of adopting kids significantly more difficult than pregnancy?4 answersWhat is best for daughter?5 answersDoes one have to always go through the court for the adoption process?9 answersMy husband's ex-wife & her husband adopted our 2 grandchildren, can we contest the adoption?9 answerswhy can't people over 45 adopt?5 answers