Atheists and Empiricism...?
I thought I paid the atheists a complement by explaining that they weren't rationalists:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Auvp99H.Iv_S7GIi27B5V2_d7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20090418221324AA6oEE4
Now, judging from the thumbs-down, either these folks don't know what a "rationalist" is (probably assuming that it has something to do with being rational), or they actually reject empiricism.
Now, if atheists reject empiricism, I would like to know about it - I mean, that seems to be their M.O. So maybe you guys can enlighten me on this one.
Interesting - in one answer the guy actually cites his reliance on empirical evidence to substantiate his rationalism...
@MOTH - lol
Maybe this will help. Rationalism is the idea that reason is capable of providing information above and beyond our senses. Theologians have been using rationalism as the basis for theistic arguments for centuries. It originated with Descartes original Onological Argument. Empiricists, on the other hand, believe that our ideas must be informed by hard evidence.
@Umbra - I couldn't care less what -ism you ascribe to. I'm just curious as to whether the thumbs-down come from a misunderstanding of the terminology, or a genuine complaint against being called a empiricist. You inform me - I'm not trying to label you.
@Lizard - I couldn't agree more.
@Eddie - dare I call your answer "rational"? Your point is well taken - I shouldn't try to draw a heavy line on this one.
@Auntb - I agree. I am a rationalist, after all.