Wouldn't this be better in adoption if instead of the tax payers paying for the births, medical, and income?

For adopted parents. If at birth the birth parents or natural parents have to pay child support to the child. For putting their child through this?

2009-05-06T12:38:48Z

I think that there would be less adoptions and more parents stepping up to take care of their children. And a perfect way for the children to know who their natural parents are. There are more children born and up for adoption that the state has payed for the births.

2009-05-06T12:58:12Z

In the case of Rape the father would be in prison and if the woman went to the hospital then they would have gave her a after morning pill. But the woman would have to file rape charges in order to get out of supporting her child. I feel sorry for the children that are told that they are a product of rape and it's not true. My son's ex tried that until she knew she would go to jail if any more lies were caught in court. Love the device of a tape recorer.

2009-05-07T07:58:54Z

There are a lot of good answers. But if it was like having insurance on your car. If caught with out it they fine you and then you have to pay a service charge extra for 3 years. Like these mother's and father's having children they can't support and putting the child through wondering why the were gave away. Charge the parents after so many from the same parents thenhave them fixs were they won't have any more like china

Princess Cherbs2009-05-06T13:10:59Z

Favorite Answer

I completely agree. I dont think it is fair at all for tax payers to have to fork over the cash for peoples personal decisions.
I think if a parent ever gives up a child, there should be some type of monetary support. Whether the parent has to put it in a trust for the child, or something like that. I dont think it is fair for adoptive parents to have to fork it out. It is one persons choice to give a child up for adoption, and anothers to adopt. None of these choices should affect tax-payers....but it does for some reason.
There are waaaaayyyy to many children in foster care/orphanages in this world. Maybe if parents were actually held accountable from birth, then something could be done about this tragedy

38

Number 2 due june 20th 20092009-05-06T12:29:19Z

I honestly don't think it would be better. I mean if your child gets put into foster care or a ward of the state the mother or father must pay living expenses in Wisconsin. Although in most cases the family adopting the child offers to pay for medical expenses and everything else.

30

On A Journey2009-05-07T07:35:37Z

Great idea, but have you ever heard the saying, "You can't get blood from a stone"? Many parents I've worked with don't have the financial means to support a child to begin with. You would need to set up some kind of government bureaucracy to enforce this and it probably would cost more than it's worth. Great idea in theory, but not necessarily practical.
Unfortunately, I don't think paying support would lessen the number of adoptions. Every biological parent I've worked with loved their child/ren dearly, but simply couldn't overcome their issues in order to be effective parents. Forcing an addict, for example, to pay for his/her child's upbringing won't help them stop using.

00

Anonymous2009-05-07T12:52:06Z

Well, the ones who were giving them up because they couldn't afford them, wouldn't be able to pay the support payments and would go to jail. Then taxpayers would be paying for the foster care of the child and the imprisonment of the parents. Not a good idea.

10

?2016-12-24T15:02:19Z

of direction it incredibly is not any longer honest...it incredibly is fairly glaring that a lot of human beings have not got a rudimentary draw close on our tax scheme or uncomplicated economics... And sure.. a flat tax could be honest...each and every physique will pay the comparable share ..the wealthy pay 10% as does each and every physique else...(for people who don't comprehend.. the wealthy guy that provides you you with a job...could nevertheless pay better than you)... i think a number of our fellow posters don't comprehend the punitive nature of TAX BRACKETING.....

00
Show more answers (4)

Related Questions

The Top 5% of TAX PAYERS pay 58% of all income taxes, Is this FAIR?Should Politicians have the exact same type of medical coverage that the tax payers have as we pay for it?The bottom 50% of tax payers pay ONLY a PALTRY 4% of al FEDERALl income taxes, Is this RIGHT?The bottom 50% of tax payers pay ONLY a PALTRY 4% of al FEDERALl income taxes, Is this RIGHT?If illegal Immigrants refuse to follow the law can I also be an illegal non tax payer and refuse to pay my tax?

Trending Questions

Is the process of adopting kids significantly more difficult than pregnancy?4 answersWhat is best for daughter?5 answersDoes one have to always go through the court for the adoption process?9 answersMy husband's ex-wife & her husband adopted our 2 grandchildren, can we contest the adoption?9 answerswhy can't people over 45 adopt?5 answers