When Catholics say that Eucharist the wine turns to blood & the bread turns into the Lords Body when we eat...?

Are they right?

This has been a squabble between denominations. Catholics think it turns to Christ blood & body after we take Eucharist.
While other Christians think it is only symbolic of Jesus Christ blood & body.

In reality, The Holy Spirit is in this Communion; and so the fruit of the vine does get into our blood system and the bread does go into our body. And we are the body of Christ if we are redeemed.

So are both ideas correct then?

2009-07-05T14:58:54Z

Catholic defender,
Uwrote:
Ps 14:4; Is 9:18-20; Is 49:26; Mic 3:3; 2Sm 23:15-17; Rv 17:6, 16 -
to symbolically eat & drink one's body & blood = assault
Those verses aren't sybmolically drinking grape juice/wine for blood and eathing bread for flesh.
Thanks for verses provided. But these verses are more talking about canabilism or something else.

So taking communion symbolizing Jesus body & bread doesn't equal assault.
That is taking things out of context.
Assault is when we actually assault someone.

2009-07-05T15:00:52Z

guitarman, were is 'transubstantiation' in the bible?

2009-07-05T15:17:28Z

christoig,
Discerning the body of Christ is important. But I don't look at the wine & bread as Christ body, but symbolic. But I see that when we take Eucharist or Communion, that the Spirit of God is in it and in us. We are the body of Christ. And we need to realize that not just me but also all other Christians who are our sisters & brothers in Christ. Who are being persecuted for their faith around the world.
Gods presence is in Eucharist because Communion is being obedient to God.
Discerning the body of Christ is much bigger than just taking Eucharist & saying it turns into Jesus body & blood.
It is realizing that we are not our own but purchased with a high price. And so also our sisters & brothers in Christ in our Church & around the world.

2009-07-07T14:25:07Z

Thanks Jim for the web site.
Very interesting. It gives a lot of scripture to read.
But I have a problem with the additions that only Catholic who are part of the Catholic Church can partake.
So, it excludes other Christians from other Churches. Sayng that Catholics are the only ones who do it right before God.
I disagree with that.
But take the 'I'm a better Christian than you.' concept out, then it is pretty good.

2009-07-07T14:47:00Z

Christoig,
Thanks for your answer.
U also added:
If you are receiving in a Protestant church you are being disrespectful to our Lord by refusing His great feast for a man made desecration then you are also sinning against our Lord.
I write:
You are not my judge. I am a spiritually sealed & filled Christian. I take communion. And I do consider Jesus Christ shed blood for remission of my sins and His body broken for my mending. And also that I am part of His Body and so are my brothers & sisters in Christ.
So I am not going to tell you to not partake in Communion in my Church because you are not a registered member.
The warning goes out to those who take Communion unworthily in most Church Communion or Eucharist services.
Because it is true that some die early because the don't discern the Body of Christ.
The Body of Christ Is Jesus Christ and His Church (All redeemed.).
And there are Christians in all Churches founded on the Rock, Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God...

cristoiglesia2009-07-05T14:46:59Z

Favorite Answer

Certainly the Eucharist is food for the believer if one is to believe Jesus’ in His colloquy at Capernaum. It is food for endurance till eternal life. It provides the grace necessary to complete the race. Jesus compares it to the manna that was eaten in the desert to sustain the Israelites. But Jesus is speaking of the New Covenant requiring a new sustenance which is His Body and Blood. In making this comparison He says that real bread comes from the father just as He and then says that He is the bread of life. If one eats this bread they will live forever. The disciples listening to Him began to realize that Jesus was not speaking metaphorically but literally and then we come to the following verse:

(Joh 6:52 DRB) (6:53) The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat

Then Jesus said in unambiguous literal language:

(Joh 6:53 DRB) (6:54) Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen, I say unto you: except you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.

The following verse indicates the purpose of eating His body and drinking His blood. It is so that we can “abidete” or in other words remains in Him by the Grace bestowed by the act of receiving His Body and His Blood. But the Eucharist benefits us even more in that it augments our union with Christ as the principal fruit of receiving the Eucharist is an intimate union with Christ.

(Joh 6:56 DRB) (6:57) He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me: and I in him.

An additional benefit of the Eucharist is that it is impossible to unite to Christ without the cleansing of past sins and preserving us from future sins through His grace. This is part of the sanctification process where we grow in our faith in him which separates us further from the risk of mortal sin. Additionally, the Eucharist participation renews, strengthens and deepens ones incorporation into the Church which is achieved through Baptism. It joins us to the entire Church Militant, Suffering and Triumphant.

This is what St. Ignatius said about the Eucharist at the end of the first century, “ the one bread that provides the medicine of immortality, the antidote for death, and the food that makes live forever in Jesus Christ.”

One may ask the question does God’s spiritual work always require a physical channel. “Always” is a very dangerous position to take when speaking of God as God can as our sovereign creator do things however he wishes. So this is really not a matter of “always” but instead, did God use the physical channel of Jesus transforming simple bread and wine into His body and Blood to bestow the Grace of eternal life.

I was reading another apologist’s commentary some time ago and He related how some Protestants get an almost Docetist view when it comes to the Eucharist. They have no problem believing something to be spiritual but when it comes to mixing spirit and matter they seem to experience intellectual and theological mind block. This is the usual excuse for not believing in Sacraments because a spiritual reality is being conveyed by means of matter. They may even believe that this is a violation of the divine plan. Matter instead of being used is to be avoided which would explain why some have difficulties understanding the incarnation. Many believe that it would be much easier if God did not dirty himself with matter. The Eucharist proves that God loves matter because He comes to us under the appearance of bread and wine. In doing so there is no contradiction in Christ being physically and Sacramentally present.

One may question how can Christ be present in the Eucharist and be also in heaven and that is a fair question. First of all, in my explanation let me make it clear that how Christ performs this miracle is a great mystery that we accept on faith through our spirit to His. If we look at the account of the last supper we see Jesus present in two ways. He is present at the table in a natural way and is present also in a sacramental way which is no different than the Eucharistic experience today and through the history of the Church. How this is done while being a mystery is not impossibility just because it cannot be understood fully with our reason. We can all accept as Christians that God is everywhere and that He is present in a spiritual sense when we are gathered together. This is no greater a mystery than him reigning in heaven in His glorified body and on earth in His natural body. If he can create the universe from nothing can he not make bread and wine into His Body and Blood? These things may be beyond our understanding but certainly not beyond God’s abilities.

For those who do not believe in the real presence there are the difficulties of the following verses:

(1Co 11:26 DRB) For as often as you shall eat this bread and drink the chalice, you shall shew the death of the Lord, until he come.

(1Co 11:27 DRB) Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.

(1Co 11:28 DRB) But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread and drink of the chalice.

(1Co 11:29 DRB) For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord.

(1Co 11:30 DRB) Therefore are there many infirm and weak among you: and many sleep.

People who refuse to believe in the real presence believe that this represents a metaphor. But, if it is a mere metaphor, how can one be “guilty of the body and Blood” when one receives unworthily? As one scholar put it “Plain and simple reason seem to tell us that the presence of Christ’s body is necessary for an offense committed against it.” (Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman, Lectures on the Real Presence) It would seem reasonable that one cannot be guilty of Christ’s body and Blood if it is not present in the Sacrament. Other scholars said ” No one is guilty of homicide if he merely does damage to the statue or picture of a man without touching the man in person.” (Rumble and Carty, Eucharist Quizzes to a Street Preacher) The question might be asked in light of St. Paul’s teaching, can one be theologically satisfied in the meaningless belief in a Real Absence than the fuller meaning of a Real Presence.

In Christ
Fr. Joseph

NOTE:

I assume you are a Protestant, at least I pray that you are for if you are receiving the blessed Sacrament without discerning the real, actual and substantial Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of our Lord you are committing a most egregious sin. If you are receiving in a Protestant church you are being disrespectful to our Lord by refusing His great feast for a man made desecration then you are also sinning against our Lord. http://fiatvolvntastua.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-does-church-refuse-to-share.html Jesus said that it is the Spirit that gives the life through faith in Jesus’ words at Capernaum. Communion is being obedient to God but to create a symbolic man-made presentation to replace His great feast is idolatry in the worst sense and shows a lack of indwelling of the Holy Spirit to not recognize that such is a man-made desecration of Christ’s commandment in place of obedience. Such actions are not communion with one another but a mocking of Christ’s commandment. So yes, it is bigger than being His Body and Blood because of the eternal consequences of the sin and of refusing the grace that our Lord offers. The Body of Christ, meaning the invisible Church are not those disobedient to our Lord but instead those outside His will and His grace.
http://fiatvolvntastua.blogspot.com/2009/06/church-is-both-visible-and-invisible.html

NOTE:

"It has to be symbolic as when Jesus first gave this example He was still alive and His blood still flowed in His veins. So when He said,"This is my blood" it was a symbol of what His sacrifice for sin would do."

Good try but denying the possibility of Jesus performing a miracle is bringing into question His divinity. The fact is that the Bible answers this delimma you are attempting to make. Jesus said to, "Do this in "Anamnesis" of me in the Greek, "remembrance" as usually interpreted in English. "Anamnesis" is a word that denotes a miracle that transcends time and place. It does not mean to recall a past event as remembrance describes but instead by a miracle of our Lord we are place present at the one sacrifice for all. While the miracle to us brings present the past to the disciples Christ's miracle brought the future present.

Daver2009-07-05T20:12:10Z

<<When Catholics say that Eucharist the wine turns to blood & the bread turns into the Lords Body when we eat...? Are they right?>>

Yes!


<<This has been a squabble between denominations. Catholics think it turns to Christ blood & body after we take Eucharist. While other Christians think it is only symbolic of Jesus Christ blood & body.>>

Once the Bread and Wine are consecrated by the priest, they become the Body and Blood of Christ. This is BEFORE the congregation receives the Eucharist. It is already the Body and Blood of Christ when the congregation receives the Eucharist.


<<In reality, The Holy Spirit is in this Communion; and so the fruit of the vine does get into our blood system and the bread does go into our body. And we are the body of Christ if we are redeemed.>>

No. Jesus did not teach the Holy Spirit was in the Bread and Wine. Jesus said, "This is MY Body. This is MY Blood". The Holy Eucharist is the Body and Blood of JESUS.


<<So are both ideas correct then?>>

No.
Catholics claim the Real Presence of the Eucharist.
Protestants claim symoblic meaning.
You can't have contradictory claims and both be right. One has to be right and one has to be wrong.

Jim ((C.A.B.))2009-07-05T18:26:44Z

The bread and wine are transformed, by the power of the Holy Spirit, into the Real Body and Real Blood of Jesus Christ. They still maintain the physical characteristics, however, of bread and wine.

However, Protestants reject transubstantiation and consumption of the Body and Blood. Their "communion" is merely a symbolic remembrance of the Last Supper and is not Eucharist. Catholic Christians, however, get the privilege of consuming Christ each and every Sunday. By this, Jesus shares with us His Grace. The Eucharist is the heart of Catholic worship. Our relationship with Christ is deepened by the Eucharist in ways Protestants cannot even fathom.

Luke 22: 19-20 and John 6: 48-58 both go to prove this point.

For more scriptural evidence on transubstantiation, see this link:
http://scripturecatholic.com/the_eucharist.html#eucharist-IIa

Anonymous2016-04-04T05:46:47Z

Protesants will refute this, citing their own interpretations of the bible, but Catholics, like myself, believe it. The Real Presence is a doctrine that was taught by the Church since her beginning with Christ. Its in all of her traditions and history, as well as the writings of the Church Fathers, before the New Testament was even written. The change, called transubstantiation, is caused by the Holy Spirit, through the priest. Jesus Christ becomes present for us - body, blood, soul and divinity - in the bread and wine, so that we are no longer looking at ordinary food, but our Lord and Savior. It's the reason why I converted to the Catholic Faith. God bless.

Anonymous2009-07-06T14:55:55Z

As a Roman Catholic for over half a century, I just HAD to answer your question because I remember as a child in Catholic elementary and junior high classes, I often struggled with that same conflict, and found it hard, as a young boy, to understand the Divine depth of the Eucharist. And, as I tried to summon up the right words to answer you, I read the answers you've already been given, just to get some ideas on how to describe it to you, and I read "cristoiglesia" 's (aka:Fr. Joseph's) answer, and in his answer I found every word I was looking for, and in the right order. Father Joseph, I thank you immensely. You truly know the Divine depth of The Eucharist, just like a priest in the Roman Catholic Church would. I thank God for you and your answer. His answer truly deserves the 10 points for Best Answer. God, as in Jesus our Christ, Bless you.

Show more answers (14)