I am curious. Which makes more sense. God creating the world in 6 days and resting the 7th?
from all His work he did as the Bible says, OR, Evolution? Now I point out the fact that if there is noting, how can there be a big bang etc. In school I leaned that noting from nothing leaves nothing, nothing plus nothing is nothing, nothing multiplied by anything is nothing, and nothing divided by nothing is nothing. Do the math.
2009-07-30T07:48:17Z
For some of you I see you are not using your minds as God intended.
Nothing = 0. That plain eneough for you?
Lighting the Way to Reality2009-07-30T07:56:08Z
Favorite Answer
Who said the Big Bang came from nothing? Do you think you know all there is to know?
There are numerous propositions about how the Big Bang came about. One is that the Big Bang grew by extracting energy from a limitless source that exists in a cosmological substrata. Others suggest that the Big Bang occurred when two "branes" or sub-dimensional structures came in contact with each other.
Furthermore, quantum physics states that particles are constantly created in opposing pairs that subsequently annihilate each other, but occasionally may separate and remain in existence, as for example if one of the pair falls into a black hole, leaving the other. This demonstrates that there may be other processes that may occur and provide the origin of the Big Bang.
Yours is an argument from ignorance. We may never know what actually brought about the Big Bang, but that is no excuse for believing in superstition.
Added: You are the one who is not using your mind.
Added: The Bible is a piece of superstitious crap. Also, according to the Bible the earth is a flat, immovable disk, supported by pillars and covered by a solid firmament of heaven in which are set mere lights that are the sun, moon, and stars.
Also, according to the Bible the stars will fall to the earth in the last days. How do you square that with reality?
I know some Christians who hold steadfastly to God having created the world in 6 literal days and resting on the 7th. I know other Christians who believe that God's time frame is not the same as ours and when He said "6 days" it could have been thousands upon thousands of years. After all, the Bible says "...one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" (2 Peter 3:8).
Neither scenario makes a whole lotta sense if you look at it from a scientific perspective. I've chosen to look a this from a miraculous perspective. I have a hard time giving up the literal 7 days that I was always taught about.
a million) He did no longer "had to relax." in case you study the story of introduction, you will possibly see that on the 6th day, God created guy in God's image. He knew that guy isn't "all useful," and subsequently guy might prefer to relax from his labors. God rested on the seventh day as an occasion to guy, to instruct guy, who's created in God's image, that relax could be necessary for guy. you will discover NO place in Scripture which states that "God had to relax on the seventh day." 2) Your assertion that, "if he's all useful, then He might have created the international in a nanosecond," is truthfully incorrect!! God does not ought to do issues as you think of they must be achieved. If He had chosen to take 6 months, or 6 years, or 6 centuries to end His introduction, He could have taken that quantity of time to do it. Your undertaking is which you think of you recognize extra beneficial than the author how He ought to have achieved His paintings. that's style of a Ford F-one hundred fifty telling the Ford production facility the way it may be equipped. DING DONG!!!
That's one heck of a school you attended. The theory of evolution doesn't address the big bang. Two different theories.
The big bang theory doesn't suggest there was "nothing." It suggests all matter in the universe was concentrated into an infinitesimal point and was released in a "big bang."
And yes, it makes a LOT more sense than suggesting god created everything in six days and rested in the seventh.