Why would you leave the names of the main characters out of a short story?

We're doing a study on the short story Butcher Bird by Wallace Stegner in english class. Instead of having names, the main characters are referred to The mother, the father and the boy. Why would you leave these characters nameless?

A short summary of the story, if you want it, but you don't really have to read it if you don't want to:

The story takes place during the great drought in the 1930s in rural saskatchewan. The family (the father, the mother and the boy) meet their new neighbour, Mr Garfield, who is british, doesn't like violence, and encourages the mother to try and grow some trees like he is trying to do, despite the drought. The father on the other hand, relishes in violence and puts everybody down all the time. He mocks mr. garfield after they have left his house, and scoffs at the mother's idea of growing anything.

So yeah, any help would be appreciated.

Emma2009-09-07T17:31:32Z

Favorite Answer

usually if you leave out names the characters are either unimportant (which would be untrue for this story since they are the main characters) or they are meant to be ambiguous. Without names, they seem like they could be anyone.

trimino2016-12-24T13:09:29Z

Kale Levi Mason Xavier Colby Parker Micah Milo Holden Jackson Kian Felix Brody Carter Carlton Theo Ellis Jayden Harper Jaymie Dayton Grayson Miles Sawyer Jude Tennyson Zeus

The Grand Inquisitor2009-09-07T17:28:05Z

It gives more chance to give the story a allegorical meaning that names can sometimes take away.

Anonymous2009-09-07T17:30:52Z

Its mysterious.
Duh. xD jk
But yeah, it's mysterious and if it's some kind of angst story then it'd give the story more power somehow