If we rule out adoption and abortion, what are we left with?

So many take a stand against both. But what of the "unwanted" child? I am not looking for answers for the parents (use b/c, don't have sex etc) I want to know what should we (Society) do with the child whose parent's do not take responsibility?

2009-10-09T13:26:27Z

PIP--you state "Your question is very offensive and uneducated to the poiny of also being patronising."

How so? Because I am looking for answers to give my children? Because I have adopted foster kids and wonder what else life could offer the "unwanted" child? Because I really really want to make a difference and not just sit around complaining?

Or maybe because I recieved a call in the middle of night from a casual acq. of 15 yrs ago who stated "come get this child or else" and I really really want to know what the "right" thing to do is!
I now have a 2yr old UNWANTED child who needs a loving/caring home that does not already have 7 kids.

Remember I said unwanted: Obviously your child was very much wanted and loved.

2009-10-09T13:34:54Z

**Before anyone jumps the gun, we have already placed her in an adoptive home where her needs can be met**

But did I do the "right" thing? And what on Earth could I have offered her? Abortion is obviously not the option, she was not abused as most foster kids.
Mom just checked out: And YES we did offer all kinds of support, money, services, classes etc.

However, this does not change the fact that she gave me her 2yr old at 1am and did not even know my last name.

Anonymous2009-10-09T10:46:03Z

Favorite Answer

First, create a society in which people feel supported and able to care for their children.

Second eliminate private adoption and dispel myths about infant adoption.

You do those two, and the only need for adoption will be for those TRULY unable to care for their children, or deemed "unfit" by a judge to raise them.

And abortion will always be an option for a pregnant woman, but you can't put abortion and adoptin in the same sentence, as one is removal of a fetus, the the other has nothing to do with a fetus.

drkangel210e2009-10-10T04:45:48Z

Sometimes adoption is the only right answer. In the case you have described above, that seems to be the case. At least an open adoption would allow the child to have some contact with their first mom... Most adoption reform advocates aren't saying that ALL adoptions are bad, just that there need to be changes about how adoption is handled in our culture. Lack of information does nobody any good.

Finally, I was an "unwanted" child. I have problems, but I'm happy to be here, to be alive. My first mother told me a few days ago she was very unhappy during the last few months of her pregnancy. Of all the alternatives: death in-utero, life with a woman who didn't really want me, or living the life I had; I would choose the one I lead as an adoptee.

I guess all I'm trying to say here is that you can take the "unwanted" label and shove it. Every child, every person, has value. Why should the value of that little girl or any other "unwanted" child be determined by someone elses opinion? My mother-in-law payed a great deal of money to carry my husband to term. Is he worth more than I am? If your child was conceived for free and you had a normal pregnancy, are they worth more than me and less than my husband?

You get my point. My issue isn't with you, but with your choice of words.

EDT: I also want to add that this is my perspective. Others on here would rather have been aborted than be an adoptee. Understand that I respect their feelings, as I've struggled with some pretty serious issues myself. It's not easy, but I just felt the need to stand up for those of us who are labeled as "unwanted" from birth.

love my life2009-10-10T00:49:37Z

Of course parenting would be the obvious answer. However it really isn't a good plan to say that you have to raise the baby you gave birth to. Especially when you look at the number of children abused by their parents on a daily basis. The sad truth is that not everyone should be a parent and just because someone can get pregnant doesn't mean they can or are capable of parenting. If someone truly doesn't want their child the child is much more likely to suffer from abuse, be it physical, emotional or physiological. So unfortunately there will always be a need for adoption. Just because there is help and programs out there doesn't mean they will be used. Kinda like you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink
The only other option if there would be no adoption would be orphanages. Were they would be overcrowded and again not properly taken care of. Yes there would be foster homes, but there are only so many that choose to foster and they can only take so many at a time..

And you did the right thing with the little child. The mother didn't want her and really didn't seem to care where she went as long as she went.

Mel2009-10-09T16:50:56Z

Very few children are "unwanted". More often mothers are scared because they can't give their children every financial thing that we as a society believe they deserve.

So what should society do?

Make it easier for young or poor mothers to get the help they need to raise their children, without labeling them or targeting them for taking their children.

Society needs to increase the amount of family stepping up to help, we once thought it took a village to raise a child, so why can't extended family help? My daughter will tell you she doesn't have a daddy, instead she has a Grandma, a PopPop, a Uncle Mike, An Auntie Sam, and a Sean. She seems to think that having all those are better then just having a daddy.

Society needs to make birth control and sex education available to all, you said you don't want answers like that, but it will help. There are too many who practice obscure methods (like douching) because no one has taught them that it doesn't work and then taught them the appropriate measures to take.

If and only if all these fail, meaning mom cannot parent even with help, family cannot raise the baby, dad or dad's family cannot raise the baby. Where guardianship is not an option. Then we need to go to open adoption. Where no families ties are lost and information is always there for the adoptee to access and know his or her roots.

?2009-10-09T20:14:02Z

CONDOMS

Stop stigmatising unmarried women who have babies! help girls and women to care for their children and keep families together. these problems shouldnt exist, we dont live in the dark ages, we all KNOW that babies are made from SEX and there are condoms, and the pill, and the metal bar thing, and even the morning after pill if you wanna consider that.
i am against abortion. i am also adopted, and while adoption isnt perfect at all im glad my mother didnt take the option of 'going to england' cos whatever problems i have i would rather this then never having existed. so keep families together if possible and give out free condoms and contraceptive methods.

Show more answers (20)