Any educated person knows to read both sides of any story.
To be fair I have spent a fair amount of time reading these:
450 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
What have you read that goes against what you accept?
Anonymous
Favorite Answer
Are you serious? You liberals, which are the POP CULTURE, absolutely own the newspapers, Hollywood, Education and everything else. You can't go anywhere without dealing with liberalness which isn't limited to global warming. You want an article that I have read?
Sure...whatever floats your boat...
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/01/19/eco.globalwarmingsurvey/index.html
I just read this one, Lib.
kent j
Thats funny. Um.. Do you read/listen/see anything in the mainstream media? It is ALL 100% pro MMW. All of it. So any article i read or story I read against it is just a little bit on the side of fairness.
This is a new science. For ANY scientist to act so certain about this incredibly complex system is totally against 200 years of scientific experience.
A hard science is one where you can control 1, ONE, variable.
Name a controlled global environment experiment. Can't be done.
Climate science is much softer a science than chemistry or engineering or physics. Most of this 'science' is involved in the creation of computer models. Give me a break. COMPUTER MODELS.
The biggest lie that spews from Al Gore and his ilk is that MONEY is on one side.. and truthful scientists on the other is hogwash. Money is on both sides folks. Gore is wealthy from this lie he keeps telling. and he and his cronies will get wealthier..
They tak limos and private jets to copenhagen. Definite proof they are blithering, lying, vapid people making money off FEAR.
FEAARRRRRR>.. BOO.
A warmer planet woujld be better than a cold one. That is a known fact. Historical fact. Verifiable Fact.
But that is one fact you never hear.
(deserts would blossom, canada would grow wheat and greenland would be GREEN)
HOPE for global warming. An iceage would be disastrous.
Besides.. If Al gore was such a great guy. He would speak kindly to his detractors and offer debate anywhere, any time.. bringing his truth to the table. Thats what real scientists and truth lovers do.
They talk with the opoosition. They WRESTLE with issues... the do not label their opponents as flat earthers.
That is yet another proof that your global warming proponents are cundts.
Oops.. did i use an ad hominem attack? Yup... you got it Al Gore and Obama are lying Cundts. And that is actually a discredit to cundts world wide.
Delete... Delete.. Delete... liberals are the champions of censorship.
Anonymous
The University of Bristol ,Wolfgang Knorr, has said that C02 in the atmosphere is at 0% since 1850,
it has been 0.7% since that year and has stood at 1.4% every year since, this amounts to near zero.
The promoters of Global warming are liars who use the lie to force more taxes out of the people and to spread fear amongst the poulation.
Climactic changes have always occurred and will always occur until the end of the world, yes we as humans spread pollution and filth across the planet but global warming as a term is wrong, in fact the Earth has got colder over the years.
All politicians of the three main party's are liars.
Anonymous
they do no longer ignore approximately worldwide warming, they ignore approximately that the human-precipitated carbon-dioxide (CO2), might desire to be the basis of all evil for this reason. The earth has continually been warming up, and cooling down many times returned, in jurassic time-era fx, it substitute into plenty warmer than it fairly is as we communicate. Even in the medieval situations we had a era looong era of warmer climate. in the 70's anybody feared worldwide cooling, and the probability of a sparkling ice-age, because of the fact the graph on worldwide temperature have been going especially downwards after a era the place the temperature have been increasing. apart from the temperature has because of the fact the three hundred and sixty 5 days 2000 been going downwards returned. I in basic terms think of we'd desire to continually settle for that those climate variations have continually been occurring, and could keep occurring and on and on continuously. human beings deny that CO2 is the final sinner of all time, because of the fact it in basic terms is against the human good judgment, once you have somewhat some understanding. maximum folk in basic terms have confidence what they hear, whilst it fairly is somebody of severe authority announcing it, because of the fact they have not got any historic past understanding in any respect, different than "it fairly is a greenhouse gasoline". That pronounced, i'm chuffed to make certain have this fuzz over us, so as that the scientist and engineers gets on with the form in the sphere of option potential. because of the fact nomatter the worldwide warming, we are understanding of oil and choal, which there is a super number of undesirable issues to assert approximately different than the CO2 produced whilst burning it.
Anonymous
We're forced to read the reports from bureaucratic scientists all the time, because they're the only ones reported by the media. It's much rarer to ever read any opposition to global warming. It's much harder to find balanced articles in the mainstream state-sponsored media.
Pull your head out of your big fat bias, and wake-up to reality.