Misuse of question and answer format?
Yesterday someone asked "Atheists, studies show you are less generous than theists, why?"
I provided an answer, with a reference, showing the amount of foreign aid donated by the top ten donor countries and showed that, per head, non-religious countries donate far more than religious countries (e.g., US donates $41 per head while Norway donates $375 per head).
I think this clear showed that the "questioner" was wrong (note, he didn't provide any evidence for his assertion).
Sixteen people thumbed up my answer.
Today I got an email saying me answer had been deleted for "misuse of the question and answer format".
So, if providing a direct and relevant answer to a question is wrong, what exactly is this website for?
And why did someone report me?
@Barking Toad: Yes, I've disputed it. I was just surprised because I've certainly posted plenty of responses in the past that might be construed as not being direct answers, but this wasn't one of them.
@JeffreySpringer57: It wasn't "charitable donations per head" it was "foreign aid per head". I was already aware that the Scandinavian countries donated far far more than most per head so I just went to google and found loads of links confirming it, e.g.:
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0930884.html#axzz0wU1dCYyb
http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/world-top-ten-doners-of-foreigner-aid-map.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/05/business_aid_and_development/html/1.stm
@Greg: Having a state church doesn't mean everyone believes it. We have two here in the UK (CoE and CoS) but hardly anyone goes to church.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Norway