Does the US consider executions by the state to be euthanasia?
I'm writing a paper about euthanasia, and there is a strange sub-category of euthanasia called involuntary euthanasia, where individuals are put to death involuntarily. My argument is that if the individual does not want to be killed, then it cannot be euthanasia, because euthanasia is only euthanasia if done with the best interests of the patient in mind; thus, if the patient is unwilling, then the euthanisor is not serving the patient's best interests and is in fact committing murder. Thus, I believe the entire category of 'involuntary euthanasia' cannot exist. However, just to be sure, I want to see if anyone knows if state executions by the US perhaps are ever justified as euthanasia. Because state executions seem to be the only practice approximating anything near a 'legal' involuntary euthanasia: The prisoner is not willing, but it's legal anyway. I think the answer is no, but am I missing something?