What's worse: Cavs losing by 50 to Lakers or Lakers losing to the Cavs?

astroboy2011-02-16T18:34:21Z

Favorite Answer

Losing by 50 is bad, but you're talking about a team that starts a guy named Christian Eyenga. On no other team in the NBA would he get a start.

And the Lakers are the two time champs...

Laker fans can bury their heads in the sand all they want, but if the Lakers lose to the Cavs tonight ( a team that just set the record for most consecutive losses in NBA hisory!), they should be ashamed on themselves. It's disgraceful...

Anonymous2011-02-16T18:20:18Z

Lakers losing to the Cavs.

Mackoy_24842011-02-16T18:39:07Z

definitely lakers losing to cavs.

Anonymous2016-10-15T10:39:51Z

its exchange right into a good sport... props to the cavs... (im a laker fan) lakers in simple terms couldnt cling on interior the top.... while kobe OR lebron gets going they wont be stopped, protection or not... so lebron caught fireplace and couldnt be stopped...kobe sat out too long interior the 4th and alter into chilly off the bench... phil jackson is the only individual who can end kobe ;D... postseason would be exciting.... btw i dont see how cavs followers constantly say CAVS>LAKERS... while they are asserting KOBE HAS a greater effectual team THAN LEBRON THATS WHY HE HAS jewelry.... is mindless... in simple terms asserting...

IM2NASHTY2011-02-17T02:26:53Z

The Champions Losing to a team that just came from a 26 game losing streak

Show more answers (5)