Is there ACTUAL HARD EVIDENCE against Casey Anthony?

Can you list all the ACTUAL hard evidence that Casey did it, OR, is the evidence against Casey ALL CIRCUMSTANTIAL? I don't think folks should be put to death ONLY for being a negligent mother, lying, or partying.

I read a lot of transcripts, news articles, watched a lot of news reports, and the foundation of the case against Casey is based ONLY on circumstantial evidence. The car trunk MIGHT have smelled like a dead body??? Do we have "dead body smelling experts" on the case??? Was it a young person's dead body smell, or an old person's dead body smell, a dog, cat, monkey, or chicken?

Plus we all know the Florida legal system is probably the most corrupt in the world. It's ONLY because of the Florida legal system that Bush got to be president.

All these circumstantial factors are not proof, nor are they JUSTIFICATION, for the death penalty.

I ask again what is the HARD EVIDENCE?

2011-05-22T08:00:02Z

That's a good list but it's still ALL CIRCUMSTANTIAL. There's NO HARD EVIDENCE tying Casey directly to the crime, and for that, the death penalty is unjust.

A boyfriend could have killed Caylee, used the computer, left the evidence. Similar to the corrupt FL legislature seeking ONLY to get Bush elected, this case is similar in that they are not even considering looking for ANY OTHER suspects.

missmayzie2011-05-22T03:07:45Z

Favorite Answer

All the evidence? I'd be here for the next week. I will name some of the evidence. Hundreds of pages of the evidence were released to the media quite some time ago.How hard is a computer? Evidence from her computer showed she planned the crime ; research on chloroform, traces on the remains- which coincided with the torture she inflicted on an innocent infant.Evidence doesn't have to be hard to be evidence. The death trunk was proven to have had the child's body in it. Nowhere does it say Might have been a dead body.Casey Anthony's dad confirmed the scent of a dead body in the trunk, to police.The mother did too, until she put two and two together and didn't want to hang her daughter for murder.So now Bush had something to do with the brutal torture murder of a baby?Where's the hard evidence on that one?There is an abundance of hard and also circumstantial evidence .Most people are upset that a little kid has to go through an excruciating tortured death; and then have her bones scattered all over Casey's old stomping grounds and pet cemetery.Hair from the child's head, pulled out by the root, was found in the death trunk. The jury of her peers will judge her.The criminal hasn't been put to death. They are in jury selection at this time.Sure the death penalty isn't right, but neither is killing a child.She should never see freedom for as long as she lives and breathes. Words of confession coming from the mouth of Casey Anthony couldn't be as convincing of her guilt than every single solitary move she has made while committing the crime-since the crime occurred. If it had all been video taped, there could hardly be more evidence as to what Casey Anthony did, and to whom. Stickers from Cayley's bedroom decorated her corpse. There's a world of evidence to show Casey Anthony made up a fictitious lady to blame the crime on.The list goes on and on.

00

?2016-10-20T08:46:25Z

there is plenty greater 'circumstantial' data that Casey killed Caylee than there is that Scott Peterson killed Laci. He sits on death Row at San Quentin. the appropriate data that she did willfully or by utilising twist of destiny brought about the death of her daughter is the reality that she did not report the toddler lacking--ever. It develop into her mom that called regulation enforcement. the precise place of the duct tape on the face of the little lady is indicative of no count if she develop into already ineffective whilst it develop into utilized. Or, it might additionally point out that this develop right into a planned homicide. i would not prefer to be in this jury.

00

?2011-05-21T10:05:06Z

Too bad you don't have contact with the jury, because they wouldn't have to think this out with your advice the answer would be clear. I mean, it's so obvious--Why have a trial? Same way with the IMF guy and Arnold . . . they're guilty, clearly. Oh wait. Arnold wasn't charged with a crime, so maybe we should lay off that and let this family matter be handled by the people involved.

01

PATRICK R2011-05-21T10:50:42Z

Old case, Old News. I Don't Know.

01

Related Questions

Is there ACTUAL HARD EVIDENCE against Casey Anthony?A lot of people are saying that Casey Anthony was acquitted because she is a woman?Casey Anthony Case question?What actual proof is there in the Cacey Anthony case?How can Casy Anthony walk free?

Trending Questions

Do you trust CNN? CNN Director Charlie Chester made some startling admissions to an undercover journalist from Project Veritas, ?4 answersMother arrested after three young children found slain in Reseda – Why wasn’t the term ‘mass killing’ used in the article? ?6 answersPolice officer fired after threatening Black Army officer during traffic stop – Why isn’t discipline of improper police behavior emphasized?4 answersEvery media outlet article I read has only negative things to say about Yahoo Answers, why?10 answersDo u have sense BBC (& CNN)  have diluted News in lock-down? BBC fills its site with photos, not content & says almost nothing about brexit?9 answers