Picking a lens... Canon vs Tamron?
I have been using a Canon 50D with a kit lens for all my photography for the past 2 years. I am now upgrading. I have been looking at the Canon 24-70 2.8, and then I found the Tamron 28-75mm 2.8. There is a large price difference ($1400 for Canon, $500 for Tamron) but I almost have the full amount for the Canon. My question is should I hold off on Canon and just go for the Tamron (I would be able to then purchase a new zoom lens - 70-200 2.8 for $700) or should I get the Canon and wait to upgrade to the Canon 70-200 2.8 when I have another couple thousand?
I have read positive and negative reviews on both... I just can't decide. The weight factor of the Tamron might be nice (it is 1 pound less than the Canon) because I have been experiencing Carpal Tunnel and lifting a camera sometimes hurts.... Any thoughts?
I tried the lenses out at the store. They seemed comparable, however by the time I got back to my computer I completely forgot which images came from which lens. I would hate to go back and try to look at them again (unless I find a different store) because the same guy was there both times, and I hate a pushy salesman!
I will be using the lens for weddings and portraits. I do some commercial photography as well. I have used my kit lens (I know, bad idea) for all this in the past, but have had issues with focusing (it appears to be focused but when looking at the images they have a fuzziness to them).