When it comes to labels, are LGBTs only interested in being......?
tops or bottoms? Where do 69s, FFAs and total c**k s**kers, etc fit in. Is the scene clickish? And who decides what's "normal" in LGBT?
tops or bottoms? Where do 69s, FFAs and total c**k s**kers, etc fit in. Is the scene clickish? And who decides what's "normal" in LGBT?
Anonymous
Favorite Answer
In my mind, labels make the scene boring. I'm interested in one thing: Pleasuring him to the ultimate maximum potential there is! When this happens, HE knows he's encountered among the best there is! And there is no mistake about this.
Anonymous
Labels are highly inadequate to describe the vast complexity of human sexuality. I don't think they accomplish a darn thing except to spread confusion and misunderstanding.
And although I have limited experience, gay porn doesn't remotely seem to convey gay sexuality, like it was all staged by clueless heterosexual directors.
ツSuper Smiley Rainbowsツ
Normal? As far as culture and not sexual positions are concerned?
Well, the mainstream. If a gay person looks and walks and talks like these alledged "regular Joes", he's normal.
Tom Beaudoin
Naah. Variety babyy.
Anonymous
what about the shnoodle wadoodle's with the big noodle's, where do they fit in?