Without fine going at it with a fine tooth comb, we all know that Genesis discusses how man lived in his earliest days. He was naked and not ashamed. He lived simply off the land which provided for his needs. There was no huge society or government. We were animals until we became wiser.
People argue that evolution disproves God when God has been explaining evolution from the beginning. The word "evolution" hasn't been around forever and if someone explained it in more generalized terms then it's still the same thing. Right?
Anonymous2011-10-29T00:23:19Z
Favorite Answer
Well, no. There is no claim that "evolution disproves God". The Theory of Evolution expalins biodiversity; it has nothing directly to do with the validity of religion. The theory of evolution does however discredit Genesis, although this is incidental and is due to the erroneous claims made in the Bible.
Genesis states that plants were "created" before sunlight. That must have made photosynthesis somewhat problematic.
Genesis states that animal life began with fish but fails to mention the millions of years of single cell and invertebrate evolution which preceded the Fishes.
Genesis does not mention the colonisation of the land by insects prior to the colonisation by vertebrates.
Genesis states that grasses and fruiting trees populated the early Earth, but we know that these groups evolved late in plant evolution.
Genesis states that birds evolved before land animals, but we know that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs.
So does the Bible, and Genesis in particular, describe evolution? No.
No way can you take the creation story literally The Christian scriptures where written between 2000 years before Christ to about 200 years after.... that's all. Modern science came to be around the Mid-16th to Mid-17th centuries with Galileo and Sir Isaac Newton to Albert Einstein to what we know as modern science today is ONLY in that period.
How in the world!! could there be any science in scripture? There can not be. Just the two historical periods are separated by so much. The scriptures are not teaching science, Its very hard for me to except not just a lateral interpretation of scripture but a fundamentalist approach to religious belief. Its kind of a plague; the bible presents its self as science and it simply is not.
The bible is not a history book, and least of all a book of science. Unless you see goat blood with an incantation as a cure for leprosy.
It was a book that was written by semi nomadic herdsmen to explain things as they saw it. Evolution is not in the bible, because that was only recently (>200 years ago) discovered.
The genus Homo originated in Africa, it spread from there and developed transformations per that's version to the surroundings. those transformations are why different peoples from different aspects seem different. So even as you would possibly want to say Homo Sapiens began in Africa, they could seem very different from a modern-day eu, who has developed in a distinct way from a modern-day african. the first settlements, mutually with everlasting dwellings and agriculture, the first civilisation, develop into in Mesopotamia in modern-day day Iraq. Mesopotamia (meaning the land between 2 rivers) develop into positioned between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers. The bible did not say the position the backyard of Eden develop into positioned, I continually assumed the backyard lined the completed planet, what else might want to there have been?