What do you think of these comments about the Roman Festus calling the Apostle Paul "mad" for...?
What do you think of these comments about the Roman Festus calling the Apostle Paul "mad" for believing the gospel that he preached to Festus and King Agrippa at his trial?
Acts 26:24 Now as he thus made his defense, Festus said with a loud voice, "Paul, you are beside yourself! Much learning is driving you mad!" 25 But he said, "I am not mad, most noble Festus, but speak the words of truth and reason.
______________
Here's what Albert Barnes wrote about the above, Do you think that Barnes has hit on some unchanging truths or not?
Barnes: "Festus regarded, probably, the whole story of the vision that Paul said had appeared to him as the effect of an inflamed and excited imagination, and as a proof of delirium.
This is not an uncommon charge against those who are Christians, and especially when they evince unusual zeal. Sinners regard them as under the influence of delirium and fanaticism; as terrified by imaginary and superstitious fears; or as misguided by fanatical leaders.
Husbands often thus think their wives to be deranged, and parents perceive their children that, and wicked people assume the ministers of the gospel to be crazy.
The frivolous think it proof of derangement that others are serious, anxious, and prayerful; the rich, that others are willing to part with their property to do good; the ambitious and worldly, that others are willing to leave their country and home to go among the Gentiles to spend their lives in making known the unsearchable riches of Christ.
The really sober and rational part of the world they who fear God and keep his commandments; they who believe that eternity is before them, and who strive to live for it - are thus charged with insanity by those who are really deluded, and who are thus living lives of madness and folly.
The tenants of a madhouse often think all others deranged but themselves; but there is no madness so great, no delirium so awful, as to neglect the eternal interest of the soul for the sake of the pleasures and honors which this life can give.
re: "In light of these things we must (as always) rely only on what scripture provides us with. "
That's an excellent point, however the main point of my question was to elicit people's opinions on how Albert Barnes describes how Christians have been and still are perceived by those who do not share their Christian faith.
It wasn't a theological question.