okay so is this an act of war or not ?

Question

so now we find out at the last second that after 16 months of lying about Obama being directly involved with the F&F (holder scam), we now find out that he was involved and has now given "executive privilege".

so if Obama allowed Holder to send military grade weapons into Mexico for any reason, and those weapons were given to criminals and insurgents,  then that is an overt act of invasion by proxy which it seems is an act of war.

If we pulled a stunt like this with Russia or China what would have been the consequences, or any other country for that matter.

Artemis Agrotera · Accepted Answer

Providing weapons can violate treaties and agreements but it is not an act of war.  There is no such thing as "invasion by proxy" because we didn't send any people in to Mexico.  (When the "invaders" are already living in the country, you can't really refer to them as "invaders.")  

And frankly, America has been doing this for decades.  Read up on the Iran Contra scandal from the 80s.  It was to America's advantage that Iran and Iraq keep beating the hell out of each other . . . and while they were killing each other they didn't have the ability to direct their attention on America or our allies.

okay so is this an act of war or not ?

Related Questions

Trending Questions