Do you support the banning of Infant Circumcision?

and Male circumcision also Known as MGM (Male Genital Mutilation)
Female Circumcision was banned because it doesn't bring significant benefit to women now a lot of studies show male circumcision doesn't also bring significant benefit to men so why does still it exist?


Here it shows how it increases the HIV Infection
http://goo.gl/chkmH

"As thousands of young men in Nyanza Province troop to health centres to be circumcised in hopes of fending off HIV, new studies show it might be too early to claim victory. Although circumcision has been touted as one of the ways to prevent HIV infection, recent findings show an increase in HIV infection in regions where most males are circumcised.

According to findings of the Kenya Aids Indicator Survey (Kais) released last week, North Eastern and Coast provinces, where 97 per cent of males were circumcised, registered an increase in HIV prevalence.

Within a span of five years, HIV prevalence in North Eastern and Coast provinces increased from 0 to 1.0 per cent and from 5.8 per cent to 8.3 per cent respectively. In the same period, HIV prevalence in Nyanza Province, where about 60% of men are intact, stood at 15 per cent, the lowest in the country. "

=======================================================================
Here it shows the Circumcision doesn't reduce the cervical cancers
http://goo.gl/xL8aA

"That fact is most medical institutions such as American Cancer Society, The Cancer Research UK, The American Academy of Pediatrics and Canadian Paediatric Society do not link non-circumcision to cervical cancer.

Consider this fact: 91% of American men born in 1970 and 83% of American men born in 1980 were circumcised and U.S is considered to have very high rate of circumcision rate but strangely U.S is also reported as country with highest cervical cancer rates compared to countries with the lowest rates of circumcision like Holland, Belgium, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Scandinavia, the U.S.S.R., China, and Japan. It is obvious that circumcision rates do not affect the cervical cancer rates across the globe."
=======================================================================
You obviously know if you clean your junk everyday Smegma issue can be easily solved
=======================================================================
Here it shows how it reduce the sexual pleasure
http://goo.gl/7hHS6

"CONCLUSION
There was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment after circumcision, indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings."

2012-10-28T13:58:04Z

@what did i do to deserve this
wow you sound very sexism.

Namali W2012-10-28T13:58:14Z

Favorite Answer

it is true. i support the ban, but people have to be educated first so they support the ban.

?2016-08-01T15:46:32Z

Sure, most without doubt. A boy's correct to an intact body supersedes any parental rights in this case. The devout argument doesn't work both- I can't marry off my young daughters, or beat my children, even if I feel my god commands it. I shouldn't be in a position to cut off a part of my son's genitalia either. Maybe the truth that grown guys don't want it done will have to be a hint- if fully grown guys, who can remember the risks vs advantages, can be unwilling to have it carried out, why drive it on an harmless youngster? -Neb

Anonymous2012-10-28T14:09:05Z

It doesn't matter if Infant Circumcision is useful or not. It is a religious law for muslims and jewels and has to be obeyed by followers of these religions. Therefore, the practice of Infant Circumcision has to at least be tolerated.

Besides: Curcumcision doesn't have any ill sideeffects. I decided to get circumcised at the age of 18 and can tell from my own experience. I was able to have great masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment before and after.

?2012-10-28T14:02:11Z

At the age of 57 my father had circumcision,on advice of his doctor.My son decided not to have his first son circumcised.The medical field is in favor of the procedure.But it can not be legislated.Both of my sons did undergo the procedure,which I witnessed.It is traumatizing to the infant.So it is the parents call.

Anonymous2012-10-28T14:28:54Z

yes. infants shouldn't go around circumcising people.

Show more answers (5)