What proof does anyone have who insists that the LDS church caved into pressure?
to change the policy of blacks of African descent holding the priesthood in 1978?
I hear people insisting that the church caved in to political and economic pressure. The most compelling argument is when Bob Jones Univ. was told to start admitting blacks. But, that would not have worked at BYU because they were admitting blacks, as far as I know.
I know that some other schools' sports teams were boycotting BYU because of the church policy, but that would not have worked, at least not with state sponsored schools. For example, one school that was going to boycott was Arizona State. But, with lots of help from others, one LDS man convinced them that this was unconstitutional, since it was a government run school and the first amendment prohibits the establishment of a religion, or restricting the free practice of a religion. Since it was not a matter of civil rights being violated, and since there were black members of the church, who were not asking anyone's help to get what only God could give them, as they, and we, believe, then the boycott would be pretty much illegal.
And most privately run schools are run by churches, so it would not be in their best interests either, to boycott. They would set a precident for all schools to boycott church-run schools when ever there was some disagreement on church policy. And if the government told one church how to believe, then they could be able to tell ALL churches, and again we are getting into unconstitutionality.
So, anyone have anything else?
fact check, first of all, that article is not really about BYU. It's about the athletes at other schools. It's about how their protests affected them. In fact, it sounds like the one school that was the least affected by the whole thing was BYU.
Also, did you notice the date? It was almost another decade before the policy was changed. And most of the athletes at BYU are pretty much the same now as back then--almost all LDS.
Can you find anything on those guys from U of W and how they feel about it now?
Also, I am not talking about plural marriage/polygamy. One has nothing to do with the other.
Springs, we never claimed to have any proof of the Book of Mormon, etc.
But something like this, there should be something to back up the accusations. There isn't, of course, which is why no one is giving me a straight answer, except for a few of the Mormons.