According to the rules of physics, when an explosion occurs almost equal parts of matter are thrown out in a dispersing circle, makes since right, watch an atomic explosion as a reference, any exlosion from a center mass of nothingness would propel almost equal amounts of matter everywhere. So my question is to you believers of the 'big bang theory' is why doesn't any other planet in our solar system have an earth like ours?!! Surely according to evolutionist other species would be doing just fine if they were closer or farther away from our own sun, but there are other suns in the universe and planets revolve around them and no signs of life there either. Nothing even similar or close to our earth!!, Your belief in a big bang theory which somehow only produced life on one planet among all the rest is absurd and still unproven, and contradicts the laws of physics with regard to where things in up after an explosion, they are spread out, we would be seeing life on certainly more than ours. If there was a big bang then God created it, and then used our planet and only our planet for his planned fulfillment, Use your brains. We were obviously created by a higher existence.
M2013-04-12T19:22:04Z
Favorite Answer
For one simple thing, the Big Bang Theory is a Theory.
Like all theories, it has some demonstrable facts and it could have laws as well which are yet unseen.
However, let me tell you that you are already way off the mark in your presumptions. Watching an atomic bomb explosion for a point of reference would show you that the explosion doesn't "propel almost equal amounts of matter everywhere". Your "vision" seems to be limited to the crater formed by the shock wave and incapable of seeing the mushroom cloud. Anyways, you need to study the Big Bang Theory to know how far off the mark you were with comparing it with an explosion.
Again, there is no connection between that and the next thing you say that there should be another planet like Earth in the Galaxy, though you make the the mistake of saying "why doesn't any other planet in our solar system".
However, let's look at that. The likelihood of Earth like planets in the Galaxy is something that people who believe in the Big Bang Theory subscribe to. They merely say that they have not been found yet.
Your next presumption that there's "Nothing even similar or close to our earth!!," is preposterous. You have not got any research to back up this claim. Like I said before, we are still searching for similar planets that could very much exist.
The rest of your statements are too confused to go into now and nothing there is even remotely connected to your saying "Use your brains. We were obviously created by a higher existence."
I'm presuming you mean "Higher Intelligence", and well, can you show us any reason why anyone should find the Theory of Creation by a Sky dwelling Male Entity called God anything else but ridiculous?
The universe was compressed into a single point called a quantum singularity and at some point in the past, it began to expand. There was no matter, The energy, if you want to call it that, transformed into matter, dark matter, energy and dark energy. Why it isn't spread out evenly is a matter of initial conditions.
"when an explosion occurs almost equal parts of matter are thrown out in a dispersing circle" Nope, not always. It depends on the configuration of the bomb. Go look at some slow mo film on firecrackers.
"So my question is to you believers of the 'big bang theory' is why doesn't any other planet in our solar system have an earth like ours?!!" This doesn't have anything to do with the Big Bang Theory. That's a matter of chemistry. If you are truly interested in science, study.
The god of the gaps argument is stupid. You aren't the first to use it.
What "brought about" the huge Bang? easily, it relatively is an fullyyt meaningless question. as quickly as you rewind the clock that far, the "regulation" of reason and effect gets tossed out the window. think of of it this way - with a view to have reason and effect, you're able to desire to have time. there's no way around it. And, up till the huge Bang, time grew to become into non-existent. So, how would desire to you have something "reason" the huge Bang? the huge Bang is an somewhat confusing concept to entice close, even for the main clever physicists and cosmologists available. it relatively is not a lot a "bang" as an implosion. think of in case you have been status interior a balloon and the balloon began to boost. it would circulate everywhere in all instructions. What grew to become into there previously the huge Bang? easily, yet another meaningless question, yet there are some concepts floating available, which includes each thing grew to become right into a singularity, however this has began to come again decrease than some scrutiny at the instant. the main serious element right here, however, is that announcing "i do no longer comprehend" does not on the instant mean "god did it." those are 2 mutually unique statements. in basic terms by using fact i do no longer comprehend what brought about the huge Bang, or the answer to any of your questions, how is that information on your Judeo-Christian god? All it in basic terms skill is that i do no longer comprehend and that i'm ok with that. sometime we would ok discern it out. Or we would possibly no longer. the two way, i'm effective with that.
I suggest that you learn some real science, before you embarrass yourself any more (unless you're just an evil troll).
For thousands of years, people have said that their gods were behind what they didn't understand -- life, morality, lightning, stars, earthquakes, the origin of life, the world or the universe, etc. Positing a god to supposedly answer a question solves nothing. It's just lazy thinking that adds an unwarranted level of complexity and stops you from asking more questions.
The Big Bang Theory shows how the universe grew from nothing but a random quantum vacuum fluctuation, creating the energy and matter as it expanded (with the balancing negative energy in the gravitational field). This doesn't make sense in our Newtonian experience, but it does in the physics of quantum mechanics and relativity.
For more about the Big Bang and its implications, watch the video at the 1st link - "A Universe From Nothing" by theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, read an interview with him (at the 2nd link), or get his new book (at the 3rd link). And, see the 4th link for "The Universe: Big Bang to Now in 10 Easy Steps."
"The total energy of the universe is precisely zero, because gravity can have negative energy. The negative energy of gravity balances out the positive energy of matter. Only such a universe can begin from nothing. The laws of physics allow a universe to begin from nothing. You don't need a deity. Quantum fluctuations can produce a universe." - Lawrence Krauss, physicist
"The cosmic microwave background radiation is one of the many reasons that we know that the Big Bang actually happened." - Lawrence Krauss, physicist
Bad physics on your part. but if YOU ascribe to the 6000 year Earth history you would realize the things work out in differing time periods. Equal dispersion doesn't mean equal consolidation or equal anything. It is 100K light years across our small galaxy, we have no idea whats on the other side of it, let alone any of the other galaxies, where Earths are a dime a dozen. The STORY of Genesis is remarkable for how close it is if you allow the stated facts to stretch a little instead of the allegorical 6 days. Plus the "working Title"of Big Bang is an anathema, it was neither BIG nor a Bang.