Who really owns the air?
At the root of the debate on smoking bans. Anti-Smokers are claiming the ownership of all Air rights. Even air within someone else s property (IE. bar/pubs/restaurants). Do they have rights to claim ownership of the air in someone else s building? Seems extremely twisted. Does that mean when political trends switch smokers can claim rights to air within Anti-Smokers households and pursue rights to smoke in their homes? What about open air that so many factories, vehicles, and nature itself pollutes all the time - who owns that air? If it's shared air and managed by the government with taxes that wouldn't it be true that smokers own more air than Anti-smokers since they pay so much more in taxes? If your house catches on fire or you burn weeds do you have to pay ownership fees on the air you pollute?
@Michael - Very good answer; But along the lines of "in any successful society every body's point of view must be considered and decisions based on what is "better" for the majority of the population." - I assume from this statement that it is your belief that the majority should decide and have the power to over-ride any sense of ownership, personal decisions or any degree of detriment to minorities (IE. A common practice known as fascism). How do you know bans are "Better"? Isn't it True that civil wars and WWII were fought to maintain personal freedom from fascist laws and over-taking? I can assure you it is not "Better" for smokers who want to further their education and are given the ultimatum of attending college or quite smoking for the day. I can assure you it's not better for bar owners. I can assure you it's not better for any business to be legally conditioned/restricted in a manner that carries no weight on thei