How can the mind evolve when it does not consist of matter?
Evolutionists conveniently ignore the various discrepancies to their fallacy, as all who support fallacies do?
Phillip Johnson, one of the most effective critics of Darwinism, writes this on the subject:
A theory that is the product of a mind can never adequately explain the mind that produced the theory. The story of the great scientific mind that discovers absolute truth is satisfying only so long as we accept the mind itself as a given. Once we try to explain the mind as a product of its own discoveries, we are in a hall of mirrors with no exit.