employment law labour hire unfair dismissal?
Hi Y'all, I have a Q bout unfair dismissal, and contracts...
See, my partner, she's been sacked from her job, for nothing really, far lower than gross misconduct.
No problem proving that...
But she's been working through a labour hire company.
But wait, there's more...
She applied for the job 6 months ago, and they contacted her and offered her the job.
The company she was working for, in a similar role was closing down, and she would have recieved a redundancy about $16k.
She was not interested in contract work, only full time permanent positions.
So the company contacted her, offered her employment, but said she has to do the first 3 months through a labour hire company. then the position would become permanent.
She did 4 months, then was subjected to an informal performance review, then sacked a week later.
The mananger that did the deed was very sorry, offered her references, said she'd done such a good job, even offered her work on a different shift. That does not spell gross misconduct to me, but anyway.
My question is If the company initially offered her employment, is that not a binding contract, albiet oral, and deferring to labour hire is just a defacto probationary period, which elapsed anyway.
The way I see it, they formed an employment relationship with her, offering her the employment.
I believe there's a case to answer here. the usual definiton of labour hire is set term or temporary, with no expectation of ongoing employment. However that's not the case here...
I tink t's wrong that companies continue to use labour hire companies in lieu of a probationary period, a situation which is open to abuse, bullying and harrassment...
I want to take them to the Industrial relations, but first want some opinions on the above.
Did the company actually form a contract when they offered her employment?