Is the Nikon 35mm 1.8 good for indoor or outdoor sports?

2015-02-09T08:41:10Z

I bought one last week. Portrait photos are awesome. Action photos not turning out as I expected. When trying to capture a person who's running...many times the lens will blur the person and focus on the background instead. Other times they will focus on one person and blur out another person. Maybe I just need to experience more with it??

B K2015-02-09T16:34:57Z

It's a bit wide for portraits - a 50mm would have been better, and it's no good for sports unless you are right next to them.

I wouldn't use a 35mm lens for either of those things. It's certainly not the optimal focal length for either of those types of photo. I find it an odd choice for those purposes.

Shooting with the lens wide open will cause a shallow depth of field, that's what's causing your focus problems.

A 35mm lens on your cropped sensor camera works out at around 52mm (35mm equivalent) which is pretty close to what some people call a normal lens - neither telephoto, nor wide angle. For portraits a moderate telephoto fast prime is better. For sports a long telephoto zoom with a wide maximum aperture is best.

BriaR2015-02-09T08:47:48Z

Depends how far you are from the action. It isn't the first lens that comes to mind. Normally you would go for short to mid telephoto indoors (70-300) and go longer outdoors.
But it depends on the sport.

Vinegar Taster2015-02-09T09:00:03Z

No. Unless you're 5 feet away from them.