For some reason this has not been appearing... 4th try... Atheists your logical rebuttal of this evidence of God?

DNA can to store non-biological information but it suffers from degradation over time. Of less capacity, yet far more resilient, is the Genetic Code. Here information can be stored. Once fixed the code could remain unchanged over cosmological time-frames.
On the behest of SETI mathematicians were presented with a code or signal embedded in terrestrial genetic codes. The code was shown to possess an ensemble of same-style precision-type patterns. The patterns were further shown to match the criteria for an intelligent signal. Only a mega-intelligence could have done this.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
This leaves only two viable possibilities. Either the mega-intelligence involved was from an alien species from within our universe or it involved a super-intelligence from outside of it.
Evidence strength: On its own I would give it a 5/10 because of the either/or scenario. However when coupled with the Oxford University Study to be posted I believe it shoots it up to about 8/10

Anonymous2018-12-03T02:16:32Z

The existence of stuffS and thingS isnt proof of gods.

Y should it be?

jpopelish2018-11-26T21:49:41Z

Your link doesn't work.

You haven't defined what you mean by "Genetic Code".
My genetics are encoded in 23 pairs of DNA molecules,
in the nucleus of each of my cells,
and in some more DNA
in each of my mitochondria.

An intelligent signal could arise
from any process that discards useless noise
and refines and replicates useful information.
Evolution does that.

I think your list of two possible sources
of any "intelligent signal"
shows more about your lack of imagination and knowledge
than they show about any hypothetical,
super intelligent beings.

--
Regards,

John Popelish