How can anyone say WWE 2k games are better than svr because more realistic?
1. Pro Wrestling is predetermined and scripted so striving for 100%realism in something scripted is illogical but if realism is your bases of a good wrestling game than 2k fails. 2. Smackdown vs raw games were more realistic with head shot with weapons and blood spilling physics. 3. 2k wrestling games limit the amount of reversals you have if you leave the ring. 4. 2k games gave up on creating a finisher isn't more realistic to create a finisher like in svr games. 5. 2 k games are consumed with micro transactions the real product is not so bad one you buy the network and see it on cable they don't try to squeeze money from you as bad as 2k. 6. Svr controls are more stable in a 2k game you could play a handicap match as 2 super heights against 1 light weight on easy hit the opponent with 4 finishers have the opponent kick out do no damage to you role you up and win.7. recent 2k games had zombie dlc , big head mode how realistic is that? If a game is not going to be realistic isn't better that you could drive a motorcycle or dive off a helicopter?