Should there be a statue of limitations on "Violatable" Answers or Questions?

I am with you on that, what a great suggestion.

I hope YA! staff will take into consideration because people think that everything is fine then get a violation for something that happen a long time that's just not right and eventually get suspended.

Most definitely-there should be...I feel you my man...this question is one of the best I've answered in a long time.I knew that people would be hating and do exactly as you mentioned(violate people-report)after reading some of my old answers & questions.My very first account had been suspended because of it...now what I do is use another account for when I want to ask silly questions or make silly replies to lame questions & what not...so far "kasanetnova" has been a goodboy...my other avatar has not!

A SOL makes sense to me... but I have to ask... was the "offensive" question a legitimate violation? Perhaps the rules are still too vague. What was the precise letter of the law back when you posed your question? I apologize for answering your ? with more ?'s, but what happens to you when have a Q? removed? Is your access curtailed or temporarily suspended? Do they court martial you, maybe bust you down to a level 5?

I got a question removed which was 1 month old, and I compltelty forgot about it until suddenly I got the violation message, and yes I agree with you ! questions that are more than 1 month old must be shielded.

I don't think there should be ANY violatable questions.