Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

NY Times & Bush?

Ok I am trying to understand more on this so please help me out. I think what the NY Times did was wrong. It's seems to me that in order to fight a war on terror we need to know who, right? We don't need this to be publicized, we need to bring terror to the terrorists. Fight them the same way they fight, and this crap in Iraq is a waste of our ability to do so, imo. Or am I wrong?

Update:

When I say fight them as they fight. I mean sneaking around and taking them out kind of one by one or in a small group(s) kind of thing. I by no means think innocent people should or could be a side affect. What I mean is they should be afraid to show their heads because we will take it, not this crap in Iraq that has NOTHING to do with terrorists. I hope that makes more sense.

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    newspapers publish these things,, because they can..it sell papers...they DO not care about the safety of the USA...their ruse is..."the public should know..

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I agree with you on the war being a waste of time. As far as fighting them the way they fight us, you have to remember innocent people were killed on September 11th. I don't want innocent blood on my hands because of that kind of retaliation. We need to aggressively look for Osama and his army of followers and give them what they deserve.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.