Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If given a choice between LAXMAN & GANGULY...?
which one of the two you gonna choose...
I'll go for Ganguly...
9 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
the Answer is quite obvicious. Sourav Ganguly.
Not that i m a fan of his, but his contribution to the team is so vital(plus if u are given a choice with Laxman).
His leadership qualities which enable us to reach 2003 world cup, making bold decisions when everyone used pack up.
I wish he becomes captain once again but the fact remains he should score runs from now onwards and i feel he can.
And look at the score card in the warm game in south africa, where he showed again when there's darkness everywhere, where and how to seek for light by leading from front again
- 1 decade ago
In test matches my choice is laxman Because he has more paitence than Ganguly But in ODI & 20-20 my choice will be change to Ganguly Because he is left hand batsman + he has large amount of shorts which he can impliment + he can bowl little & break partnership
- vakayil kLv 71 decade ago
For test matches I prefer Laxman as he has got sound technique and defence. However, for one day Ganguly is preferred
- 1 decade ago
At this juncture both are required.
You can not choose between right and left hand. Both are required. Consequently, Laxman is a right hander and Sourav is a left hander.
- 1 decade ago
in test both have to play ....
both are different natured players...
in odi : i will prefer Ganguly...
in odis : against aussies Laxman
- 1 decade ago
i am a new yahoo user ,i sell some product on yahoo .
this is my yahoo store http://www.llpshop168.com/ ,if i bother you ,i hope you can forgive me ,thank you for your time .i hope you can give me some suggest about my product.