Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Would anyone want to critique these photos?
I've answered hundreds of questions on Yahoo Answers. But I have never posted any of my pictures for a serious critique. But I thought I would just post some of them now and see what people think - just out of curiosity.
These were all taken with film, using completely manual exposure, and I developed the black and white film and pictures myself. These are scans from my original prints. (My scanner sucks though).
These are all large images (high resolution scans) so you might have to zoom out, depending on what kind of browser you're using.
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
I took this next picture about a week ago. We just had a winter storm and all the mountains were covered with snow. I took this with my Yashica A Twin Lens Reflex camera and Ilford SFX 200 film. I just wish I had a red filter for my camera:
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
Here are some other pictures, in color. These are with film, but I took them to get developed at a photo lab, since I don't know how to develop color film. The first 2 pictures are with the new Kodak Ektar 100 film. It's great for landscape photos. I didn't edit the pictures. The colors really are that saturated.
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
This one is a little underexposed, but I guess it's not too bad:
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
And one last picture! I was using selective focus here, to try to get a shallow depth of field and blur out the background a little to draw more attention to the flower. This was with Kodak Gold 200 film. I'm pretty sure I set the aperture to f/5.6 and the shutter speed to 1/300:
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityc...
I know there are a lot of links and a lot of pictures to look at! Thanks for taking the time to look at these!
Thanks Amber! And yes, I did take all of these myself. That's another good thing with film...I can always prove that I took the pictures because I have the original negatives! :)
hey, thanks a lot everyone for all the compliments. I do appreciate that. But I'm looking for more specific comments. If there is something you like or dislike about the pictures, please let me know what and why.
Edwin, you're right that most of the B&W pictures could have benefited from a yellow lens filter, since most B&W films are more sensitive to blue and do tend to overexpose the sky. In fact, I did use a yellow filter on the picture of the tree and maybe you can tell that the sky is a little darker with more cloud detail in the picture.
Also, in the picture at the lake (Lake Fulmor) with the rocks at the left side...the film developer was actually too weak. I was using Kodak D-76 and I should have known right away when I noticed that it was already turning yellow. I was just too lazy and cheap to mix up new developer. So that's one reason why it has such low contrast. That one was my fault.
And yes, the color pictures could definitely benefit with a polarizer and maybe even a neutral density filter...but I took that with an ancient Argus C-4 and I don't have a filter that will fit that camera :(
And Victoria, if I'm using completely manual exposure and I develop my own film, than I think I'm well beyond just "aiming the camera and pressing a button." But thanks :)
14 Answers
- TayLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
haha okay time for a long answer get ready!
1st one- I love the vintage/old time look it has, it looks like there's too much contrast or something but I think that's what makes me like it so much. I love all the detail in the trees and even the houses across the water. No complaints =]
2nd- I like the reflections and composition but I think it would have more visual interest if you used a contrast filter to bright out more value in the grey areas. My favorite part is the rock off to the left
3rd- I really like this one, that's such an interesting subject and the branches are focused quite sharply. The branches are a little unbalanced (a lot on the left, more empty space on the right), but that can be forgiven since that tree is just so cool looking. (By the way where do you take these pictures? it looks like such a pretty area)
4th- very pretty scene, you could boost the contrast just slightly so you get a full dark in your value scale. The shadows along the path are quite interesting, and I like the slight curve of the trees at the top. It'd be nice if you focused on one area more sharply to better lead the eye through the photo. I do like the overall composition though
5th- I love this! you have a real range in value and I love the contrast of textures. the horizon line is very interesting and I love that from afar the photo almost looks like stripes of values. Great shot!
6th- (I wish I knew how to develop color film, if you have any interest in color film though I recommend William Eggleston, one of the first color photographers) I really like the sky in this one, the trees look blurred or something (it may just be the scanner though). I think the composition could be more interesting, but I like the viewpoint. The bottom left has a little too much empty space. I'd like it better if you cropped it so the tall red tree was at the left edge. It would create a diagonal line down and right which would make the photo more interesting.
7th- This one I like, the light is very soft and pretty. The branches are interesting the way they reach across the photo. It could be a little sharper focused on the branches. I think you hit the color very well though, the sky especially, lovely shade of blue.
8th- I actually like this the way it is. The vine makes it look kind of creepy (a good creepy though). I love the simplicity of color. The tree on the right is beautiful with the green leaves and the backlight of yellow. I love the brightness of the foreground in contrast with the dark blue of the background. I think this and the 5th one may be my favorites so far.
9th- very pretty, I love how delicate the flowers are. You created a nice mood with the colors and soft light. You did a nice job with the depth of field. It makes me wish i was there right now. The mountains in the background add to the photo as well. I'd say this would also be included in my favorites =]
overall I really like them and I'm glad to see people still using film, in my opinion it's better than digital, just hard to deal with sometimes and very time consuming. With black and white it's best to always look for a full range of value (from black to white) unless you're specifically under or overdeveloping. And good light can be your best friend (creates amazing shadows and depth to photos).
You can check out some of my photos if you're interested (no film ones since my scanner is broken at the moment, but maybe someday)
- EDWINLv 71 decade ago
Black & White:
#1: The sky is blown out. Might have been saved by burning in during printing. The tree trunk is overexposed.
#2: Blown out sky. Possible to burn in during printing.
#3: Back tree trunk is overexposed. Could have been burned in during printing. Should crop the right side to get rid of the white blob in the upper right corner and the one about 1/2 way down.
#4: Blown out sky. Possible to burn in during printing.
#5: Rocks in foreground are overexposed. Would be hard to burn in during printing but possible.
Color:
#6 & 7: Really just kinda blah. Good color but just not interesting pictures.
#8: This would have benefited by trying a different composition from a different position. The sidewalk and wall are distractions which should have been eliminated.
#9: Would have benefited from a polarizer.
A polarizer works just as well with black & white as it does with color.
Often, using a Yellow filter with black & white improves contrast.
When faced with a dark subject and light subject close to each other you can meter both separately and try an average exposure. If the darker object meters at f4 and the lighter one at f8 just count up from f4 and down from f8 and use f5.6. A spot meter that does this is a good tool to have. I suggest the Minolta Spotmeter M if you don't mind buying used equipment.
These are my opinions and, as we all know, opinions are like noses: everybody has one.
Source(s): 37 years of enjoying and learning about photography. I taught a basic black & white darkroom course many, many years ago. - Anonymous1 decade ago
Please do not take my criticism for failure but I am only trying to help.. the last one was the only one that I thought showed a true photography skill and the photographers "eye". I loved the fact that there was tons of colors but you need to realize that photography is not just about clicking a button but really finding something unique. If you could look at a picture and say " anyone can do that" then you need to work harder. The fact that the flowers are blowing in the wind is classy and shows the uniqueness of the shot
if you would like you can view mine.. i am only 17 but I have had a lot of outside experience in the field and have attended courses in the city http://flickr.com/photos/vic_plourde/
- 1 decade ago
If you actually took these, then take this as a compliment:
I'm having trouble believing that you actually captured these photos.
Wow...
Ok, I was just looking through my answers again, and I noticed that you said you wanted people to be more specific.
I think that you should try to capture animals, storms, or pictures of candid people instead of just trees. You could also experiment more with the shutter speed and actual colors of the photos some more. Maybe try solarizing them? Or inverting the colors.
Hope that was helpful.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Oh my God, these are absolutely gorgeous. This is the kind of art I would love to frame and hang in my home. Normally, I would tell you which ones are my favorite but honestly, I'm in love with each and every one, especially the last. It is mind blowing how beautiful it is. The first is also extremely amazing looking.
Good work! I'd love to see more.
- 1 decade ago
i really like the sunflower picture. its really interesting and i like how it shows a flower up close and then more small ones in the background. i also love the winterstorm picture, but im not crazy about some of the pictures with just trees. some of these pictures to be honest need a little more to them to make it more interesting. awesome pictures though
- Anonymous1 decade ago
nice work... i like the 3rd, 4th and last the most, as they are balanced and not to complex, and a few of the others don't really have a feature point to focus on and are too full on...
they are all fabulous pieces of photography though!
and good job with the developing, can never get mine right, really well done...
good job...
:)
Source(s): have taken photography courses and love photography... - Anonymous5 years ago
Another blemished image with useless watermarks all over it. You could have come up with a nice image with that cool little mirror and the rose without selective color.
- 1 decade ago
these are beautiful. i especially like the one with the yellow flower. critically- color is more appealing to the eye. more color and less gray-scale are more effectual. another thing- nature pictures are calm and soothing to look at briefly, but they don't keep the viewers attention for very long. when you involve people and their emotions, your art photography will be more appealing and observed.