If Paul said to reject false science, why do people still believe in Creationism?

this question does look familiar for some reason.

human beings tend to flock with the widely used concepts of the day i propose one looks extra sane believing interior the evolution than the introduction concept. This i think is a factor of existence we would desire to get used to they rejected Christ so in some quarters you expext a huge extensive form to honestly have self belief what one guy reported than what Jesus did why they try this i cant locate words to describe

20 O Timothy! Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge— 21 by professing it some have strayed concerning the faith.

Are you one who has strayed? Believing you are evolved from a molecule is not science. It's called presumption.

Many here follow what they have learned from their particular church/religion, thoughts and beliefs have been drummed into them. Their clergy says..."this is what God says" or "this is what God wants".....and they believe blindly.

Little do they know that much of what they think is true being told to them is just simply mans interpretation that has been changed, and in many cases even isn't in the Bible.

even with their beloved saul/paul, people pick and choose

too bad so much of jesus's teaching have been lost in the process

Creationism is pure dog pile...

No where in the Bible is real science rejected.

If you believe what Paul said, then you should believe Genesis chapter 1.

Creationism fails even as "false" science.

ID could be considered false science. Biblical creationism is more like a Looney Tunes cartoon.

"Officer, would I give you that fruit to eat if it would make you kick my good friend Bugsy outta the gahden?"

"Oh, you might, rabbit, you might..."

Ignorance. Pure and simple ignorance.

Almost 2009 Common Era

Clearly you cannot follow the Bible literally if you follow the Bible literally.