Why is any negative discussion that hits on anything near race viewed as racist.?

The PC crowd doesn't like to listen to facts and statistics, they just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "RACIST!" to anyone who doesn't agree with them.

Well, you have to become a student of history -- when you see what people have gone through and all the lies that have been told and all the negativity that people have dealt with for hundreds an hundreds of years, then (and I'm not trying to sound mean) you might understand where the sensitivity comes from.

This is why psychology majors get such a bad rep:IT ISN'T A SCIENCE

If you had made an effort you would've found:

1.Rap music has a mostly white audience

2.There are not even enough black criminals to suggest blacks are genetically criminal

3.Criminals are not neurologically geared the same as aggresive normal people

EDIT:I see you didn't research african civilizations. African civilizations(songhai, ghana, etc) lasted way longer than most. If they weren't important why did colonialist try to take credit for them?(and sometimes still do today) As for only 30% of whites listening to hip hop that still means hip hop is white supported

From what I gathered your study showed that the people who listened to rap were more likely to commit crimes.

But who says only black people listen to rap. That was an assumption (kinda a racist one too)for your friend to assume only black people listen to rap. Not to mention most of the "crimes" they talk about are innocent possession of marijuana and paraphernalia.

You should look at the statistics for serial killers.

Middle aged white male

"Black people have not been in a civilized environment until relatively recently. They needed aggressive genes to survive in the jungles and hostile environments. Other cultures on the other hand have been building cities and living in them for thousands of years though, and so the more aggressive characters have been killed or imprisoned, thus not having as many children. So the majority of those cultures are fairly non-aggressive"

These are your words. Not only are they false, they display a general lack of knowledge on your part, both about the history of black people and the pace of human evolution.

If that is the "for whatever reason" part that you referred to in your question, it's not surprising that your peers found your paper to be ridiculous.

Edit- Listen to yourself. You're saying that black people are born with an inherent tendencies to commit violent acts. Your claims of the black people being born inferior makes you the textbook definition of a racist. You can stay with the company of flawed anthropologists of the 19th century and be a joke in a world where race no longer has scientific merit or abandon your prejudices and use your brain instead of letting statistics do it for you. Thinking like yours is what caused "scientists" to destroy 12 FEET of evidence when they found that the ruins of Great Zimbabwe were built by black people. They found solace in their superiority complexes, so much so that they could not face the truth. If you only seek your truth you will ALWAYS find it.

i don't think you're racist. i think you're just casting black people in a bad light something i don't think anyone, especially a non-black person should do.

It's only that way when it concerns non whites. A person of any race, white included, can tear the white race apart looking for negatives and only be seen as enlightened. A person of any race that says something negative about non whites is either a racist or a self hater. It isn't about facts, it's about political correctness and the oppression of whites that is 'hidden' in plain sight. I think some people call it privilege, lol. I'm tired of being 'privileged'.