Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
IPL shift decision is political?
Anyone noticed..... All 4 states denied IPL security are congress ruled, while states who did not denied security are non congress ruled.
Do you think if BJP would be rulling in the center, they would let IPL go ahead?
5 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
it is all political, congress govt does not want the chance to take up security for both elections and IPL, lest anything goes wrong. it is better safe to decline the cricket tournament than to affect the elections. But it has partly back-fired, with the opposition trying to woo nationalist cricket-lovers and blaming Congress as the cause for the domestic tournament to be held in foreign lands......
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It is practical, not political.
Only 4 States answered. That too, not a proper yes.
Like Punjab said " if security is provided by Center".
edit:
Sure you will read the names of 4 States somewhere. I think 2 were Maharashtra and Karnatak. Forget the fourth.
No BJP state said they would allow IPL. Guj offered after the announcement of shift.
This part is political. Shifting was practical.
- beautyLv 41 decade ago
karnataka denied and it has bjp rule.
ne way we have a headache of electons going on. its probably wise to shift the ipl. or if modi cud have been patient the ipl cud have been postponed
