What will happen to us if the world economy and use of natural resources stays the same?

Have you bothered thinking about this at all or are you hoping to have us do your homework?

The result will be disaster but exactly what kind of disaster depends on what you mean by "stays the same".

Now that the biggest economies in the world are growing again, do you mean the growth continues at the current rate or that the growth stops and that the GDP continues at the current rate? Are you allowing for new technology or not? Are you assuming a constant population or the current rate of population growth? etc.

Of course, on matter what your definition of "stays the same", in reality, it isn't possible. The only constant in the universe is change. But it would affect the outcome. For example, the Chinese government is pretty sure that its people will revolt if their economy doesn't grow at least 8% per year. So which comes first, revolt in China or eco-catastrophy?

Also, the current use of natural resources is already unsustainable, so the long term use of natural resources cannot stay the same.

there have been some many years of cooling up until the Nineteen Seventies. Now we are in a warming era. They whinge approximately ice a while whilst that's cooling and worldwide warming whilst that's warming. in the event that they at the instant are not useful, they call it climate substitute. in spite of that's, that's for sure detrimental because of the fact capitalists led to it.. The freon became on the topic of the ozone layer and not worldwide cooling. some guy had a thought on the topic of the catalytic consequence of unfastened chlorine atoms or some thing like that. .that's what I submit to in recommendations reading approximately is maximum of many years in the past besides. i think of the aerosol in touch in cooling the ambience are in user-friendly terms dirt and different solid debris suspended interior the air. The aerosols in spray cans possibly all turn to gasoline after a quick time and that i heavily doubt they have a measurable consequence even although I unquestionably have heard it claimed otherwise. One guy pronounced ozone depletion reasons the mid troposphere to relax to verify that this reason we don't see the extremely greenhouse effects. .I in user-friendly terms point out it becuase that's possibly some talking element.