Need help these disney land tickets!!!!!!(coupons)?

Well there is some good news for you, and some bad news for you.

When Disneyland first opened and through the early 80's. They used separate tickets for Admission and each ride. Each ride was assigned a "value", in the form of A-D (and later E) tickets. This is actually where the term "E-Ticket Ride" came into play, as the E-Tickets were the biggest(and most expensive) attractions.

The tickets do have an exchange value if you want to use them to buy a ticket now, but it is only the face value of the ticket(s) you have. They are actually worth more to people who collect "Disneyana" or Disneyland Memorabilia. Where depending on the condition of the tickets, and if you have an entire book or just some it could be worth a bit of money.

The coupon books were made for a time when Disneyland charged for individual attractions in the form of ticket books. They are not valid for current Disneyland admission. They can be traded in for credit towards purchasing new tickets, but they sell better on E-bay, and after selling them you can use the money to purchase Disneyland tickets.

I would call Disneyland on the telephone and explain the coupons you have, and what book they came from. They can tell you if they're valid or not without waiting until the day you show up there. Call information and get the general information number... you can either talk to a cast member on there or it will refer you to call another number. But, I'm sure they will be glad to help you sort out the coupon issue.

If Disney LAND, which is in Anaheim, suddenly appeared in Orlando way across the country, yeah I'd be pretty curious as to how THAT came about. "Q: Please describe the mechanism that intelligent design proposes for how complex biological structures arose. A: Well, the word "mechanism" can be used in many ways. … When I was referring to intelligent design, I meant that we can perceive that in the process by which a complex biological structure arose, we can infer that intelligence was involved. … Q: What is the mechanism that intelligent design proposes? A: And I wonder, could—am I permitted to know what I replied to your question the first time? Q: I don't think I got a reply, so I'm asking you. You've made this claim here (reading): "Intelligent design theory focuses exclusively on the proposed mechanism of how complex biological structures arose." And I want to know, what is the mechanism that intelligent design proposes for how complex biological structures arose? A: Again, it does not propose a mechanism in the sense of a step-by-step description of how those structures arose. But it can infer that in the mechanism, in the process by which these structures arose, an intelligent cause was involved. The interrogation goes on like this for pages and pages. Like the theorist in the Monty Python sketch, Behe throws up a blizzard of babble: process, intelligent activity, important facts. What process? What activity? What facts? He never explains. He says the designer "took steps" to create complex biological systems, but ID can't specify the steps. Does ID tell us who designed life? No, he answers. Does it tell us how? No. Does it tell us when? No. How would the designer create a bacterial flagellum? It would "somehow cause the plan to, you know, go into effect," he proposes. Can ID make testable predictions? Not really. If we posit that a given biological system was designed, Rothschild asks, what can we infer about the designer's abilities? Just "that the designer had the ability to make the design that is under consideration," says Behe. "Beyond that, we would be extrapolating beyond the evidence." Does Behe not understand that extrapolating beyond initial evidence is exactly the job of a hypothesis? Does he not grasp the meaninglessness of saying a designer designed things that were designed?

How many tickets are you trying to buy? I actually have tickets to sell if you need tickets to Disneyland.