Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
New NSA Advisor Donilon: Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Fannie Mae?
Change we can believe in??? The former NSA chief James Jones, a higly decorated 4-star general, also was on the board of directors of Boeing and Chevron.
With all the lack of change, the parade of war profiteers and bailed-out business moguls in and out through the revolving door, do you still support Obama and the Democrat party? Isn't it painfully obvious there is one party in Washington; the war party. Can't we get 40 million voters to vote for a non-establishment candidate - one who just might represent We the People over muti-national corporations? Is there any other way to reduce the wars, police actions, proxy wars, and regional conflicts in which we're involved? Or should we 'stay the course' until we're completely insolvent and nobody will buy our debt? Thanks.
1 Answer
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Doug4
Not without deep systemic change.
I am assuming the Tea Party comment was a deeply cynical joke.
Before the Primaries where the people thin the herd, there is a money Primary where business chooses who they will throw money behind.Usually from a CFR globalist pool. Obama' real constituency were the banks and Arms/Warlords, They expected to be rewarded and they were.They brook no deviance either.
When Obama claimed in an interview that he was not just there to help fat cat Bankers--- A New York times article appeared as a warning that business would throw support to republicans and they did-- electing Scott Brown.
The "two"Parties also have monopolistic benefits that third party candidates don't have at the state level. 16000 names and address's have to be Garnered for a new candidate in a week in some places.When they "De-regulate" it is always to the Benefit of those at the top of society.
These boons include relative freedom from arrest-- the recent FBI raids were against socialist organizers, and anti war activists labeled now as terrorists.
We won't see a Eugene Debs or John Bertrand Aristede pull off some surprise
because of the way the system is structured.
But this has no particular legitimacy, in fact none in My opinion.
But i am no longer thinking we can"reform" our way out of the Neoliberal/Imperialist Project imposed both at home and abroad.
>>>>>>>>>Will M
