Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What's the point of Boise State moving to the Mountain West Conference?

Boise State will be Moving to the Mountain West conference next year (or the year after..).

I thought it was because they were going to play better teams and maybe turn the Mountain West into a Automatic Qualifier, but now that Utah, BYU and TCU are moving on to the Pac-10 (12) and the Big East, the Mountain West is going to have No one in it except Boise (until Nevada and Fresno St. Move there)...I'm confused about the point of all the moves...

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I think Boise State joined the MWC before all those teams started bolting. They probably were thinking that TCU, Utah and BYU would be there, and that would be strong enough for the MWC to become an automatic qualifying conference. With Nevada, Fresno State and probably Hawai'i moving to the MWC, it's still a possibility, but it's less likely. They can't join the Big 12 or the Pac-10 it seems, either--the Pac-10 cares too much about academic prestige to take Boise State, and the Big 12 is not interested in expanding right now. They didn't even want to take TCU. Either way, it's not as if Boise State can back out now, and neither can any other team.

    All of these teams are looking for ways to play for the national title if they go undefeated. Utah made the best decision for that, getting into the Pac-10. BYU, I think, made a big mistake going independent and Boise State's being in the MWC probably won't be much help. TCU to the Big East could work out, except nobody respects the Big East. The ACC is more highly regarded than the Big East is and they still have a hard time getting title contenders out of their conference. So, winning the Big East and going undefeated doesn't guarantee TCU anything, but it's better odds than going undefeated in the MWC.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They decided to make the switch under the assumption that Utah, TCU an BYU would still be in it. Unfortunately all of them are leaving for other conferences so the end result is them not really making much of an improvement as far as schedule. Had all those schools stayed, the Mountain West probably could have made a legitimate claim for an automatic BCS bid for the champion, especially in the context of how weak the Big East has been lately.

  • 1 decade ago

    Now Boise State should have stayed in the WAC. They actually hurt themselves by moving because the WAC is better then MWC which BYU, TCU, and UTAH all have left.

  • 1 decade ago

    I don't know if I should find in coincidental that these schools left after Boise joined or if I should find it as a compliment that no one wants to be in the same conference as Boise

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I never could find the answer.

    BTW, BYU's going independent.

  • 1 decade ago

    idk they probably weren't planning on all those teams leaving. (by the way TCU is going to the Big East). cuz i kno that they've been trying to get this to happen for a couple years

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There is no difference. They will always be that weird sideshow who plays on a blue circus field.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    they want to screw over the WAC (who will only have 6 teams)

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.