Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Steve B asked in Science & MathematicsPhysics · 1 decade ago

How is it possible for light (photons) to be Refracted?

We aim a laser at a glass block. The beam strikes at an angle, and is Refracted or 'bent' (ignoring the part that is reflected). The 'classical' explantion for this effect (see wikipedia) treats light as a 'wave' .. well in a light 'beam' from a laser we have billions of photon's & so it's not unreasonable to claim that all these photon's interact with one another, so treating the beam as a 'wave' is a reasonable representation ..

Now, let's reduce the intensity of light emitted by our laser - does the 'beam' still get 'bent' ? = well, yes, of course you say ...

At some point the intensity of the beam is reduced to the point where we are emitting individual photons .. now, why are they still 'bent' ? (no cheating - you can't claim 'group interation' or 'intergate' over 'the whole stream' because I can arrange this experiment to fire just photon one into the glass .... watch it 'bend' and then stop ...)

Update:

No double slit involved here = so there should be no 'quantum uncertaincy' / 'interferrence patturn' possabilities ...

However I can see the suggestion that photons should not be regarded as 'localised' until they impact the detector. Thus, what 'hits' the glass surface is a 'disc' or 'sheet' of photon quantum 'probability' travelling 'face on' (i.e. the probability function 'disc' is spread out perpendicular to the direction of travel - photons travells at 'C', so the disc has zero thickness). When the disc hits the glass at an angle, one edge hits first and is slowed down ... as each part of the disc successivly enters the glass, the result is the disc gets 'bent' ... (when the disc hits the glass 'head on' there is no change in direction because the entire disc slows down at once) ..

OK, so MAYBE it makes sense :-)

Update 2:

(no nonsense about waves required after all :-) )

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    to answer your question with my understanding the light particles or particle acts as both WAVE and a particle, in fact if you refer Stephen hawkings Brief history of time" Chapter 3 the end part

    Consider a partition with two narrow parallel slits in it. On one side of the partition one places a source of fight of a particular color (that is, of a particular wavelength). Most of the light will hit the partition, but a small amount will go through the slits. Now suppose one places a screen on the far side of the partition from the light. Any point on the screen will receive waves from the two slits. However, in general, the distance the light has to travel from the source to the screen via the two slits will be different. This will mean that the waves from the slits will not be in phase with each other

    when they arrive at the screen: in some places the waves will cancel each other out, and in others they will reinforce each other. The result is a characteristic pattern of light and dark fringes.

    The remarkable thing is that one gets exactly the same kind of fringes if one replaces the source of light by a source of particles such as electrons with a definite speed (this means that the corresponding waves have a definite length). It seems the more peculiar because if one only has one slit, one does not get any fringes, just a uniform distribution of electrons across the screen. One might therefore think that opening another slit would just increase the number of electrons hitting each point of the screen, but, because of interference, it actually decreases it in some places. If

    electrons are sent through the slits one at a time, one would expect each to pass through one slit or the other, and so behave just as if the slit it passed through were the only one there – giving a uniform distribution on the screen. In reality, however, even when the electrons are sent one at a time, the fringes still appear. Each electron, therefore, must be passing through both slits at the same time! A nice way of visualizing the wave/particle duality is the so-called sum over histories introduced by the American scientist Richard Feynman.

    Thus it seems that particle of light behave both like a wave and a single particle too. and thus show the nature of wave as well particle. going through slit as a wave and going through both slits at a same time as a particle...

    Source(s): Brief History of Time: by Stephen Hawkings.
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    diffraction (ie. bends around an object) this is why longer shadows are fuzzier than shorter ones

  • 1 decade ago

    Because particles in motion are also waves.

    Watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.