Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is this a fair summary of Chamakh?
Cant't dribble very well
Can't pass very well
No pace
Poor at finishing
Poor first touch
Doesn't get involved a lot
Loses the ball frequently
His goals tally is an illusion of how good (bad) he actually is
This is my summary from properly watching him, and yet I keep being told "chamakh is awesome, look at his goals".
I've done more than look at his goals. I am not impressed by him.
Peter F: Bendtner has scored LOADS of headers for Arsenal... AND he is miles better at everything else. Plus Nasri is 23. Chamakh is 27. Time isn't on his side.
accybeme: Sorry mate but this question is for proper football fans. Not the people who state the obvious. Do you think I dont know my own team and how many goals he has? lol if you want to edit your answer and include stuff that equates to the question feel free :)
PLUS he was free, not £7 million you wolly. And we have Bendtner. Do you even watch football?
10 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
whoa age 27, hey, im not a fan of arsenals or think his a top notch player but the only positive i can think of is that his good in the air, your summary is sorta fair as i have seen him do those things, im not that impress by him also and i do believe bendtner should be ahead of him, this season he hardly played and i think he got 3 goals in like 3 or 4 appearances this season
Source(s): wtf, im the 3rd peter to answer this question - 1 decade ago
RVP remains our no. 1 striker, he and bendtner have to fight it outfor second spot, personally i like bendtner more, chamakh did look a little out of ideas at times but i will judge him only when the season ends,
don't forget he played lone striker role from beginning, even when he has always been more of a support striker, cut him some slack, with a fit Van Persie in side all our strikers and wingers score a lot more
- 1 decade ago
Just need to wait and see what he will do next season, Nasri didnt start well and look at him now. But Chamakh is the only player who can give height in attack for arsenal, thats his purpose. On plus side his heading ability is very dangerous
- Anonymous1 decade ago
He isnt Arsenal quality in my opinion, we would have done a whole lot better if RVP was fit for most of the season, against Chelsea he gave us something that we have been missing for quite a while, he brought THEO and SAMIR into the game.
I dont think Chamkh is that good, in fact i would rather Bendtner playing than him.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
You are spot on.
I love Arsenal and was hoping and expecting Chamakh to live up to the hype.
I cannot remember a single time I thought "oh, what a great play" I do remember a few times watching Chamakh and saying "hey hun, come here, check it out, cesc's gonna choke that tall guy in a second, watch"
- Anonymous5 years ago
Almost, but not quite. While it's true that atheism means the lack of belief in deity, that does not necessarily have to take the form of an assertive disbelief. Certainly somebody who does make the positive assertion that deities don't exist would be an "atheist", but not all atheists fit that description. To make an analogy: I don't believe in aliens from other planets, but I'm NOT making the flat claim that they outright DON'T exist. I just don't buy the claims I hear from die-hard alien believers. So I simply "lack a belief in aliens".
- ?Lv 51 decade ago
This season he is your most used forward
He is also your leading goal scoring forward
And as a centre positional forward its him or Van Persie
I agree he’s not a Henry
but neither is he Fanny Jefffers who cost Arsenal £10m
what do expect for £7m
- 1 decade ago
he still scored few goals thoo.
i guess he is a intelligent player rather then some of the things u mentioned.