Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What is the distance in meters?
Derive the distance between protons in a
hydrogen molecule (revist)?
Data:
k = 1 / 4πeo
m = 9.106E-31 kg
q = 1.602E-19 C
ħ
1/7/2011
Angstroms or parsecs, ok.
It's a clash of titans.
Accept the challenge!
Feel free to ask for more detail.
2 Answers
- DrGerardLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
So far, the closest anyone has come to a mathematical derivation (ab initio) of the distance between two atoms in a molecule is for the simplest case of them all. This is NOT the hydrogen molecule itself, which is already too complicated for that (it includes two electrons) but the "molecular ion" H2+ which consists of two protons and a SINGLE electron binding them. See first link below for the presentation by Mark E. Tuckerman (professor of chemistry at NYU).
Tuckerman's discussion is based on nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (see second link for a general introduction by myself).
The distance you are after (for H2+ at least) is denoted R_e and called "equilibrium bond length" near the bottom of Tuckerman's page. He does not give a numerical value which could be compared to experiment.
That comparison is done at the bottom of another page (third link below) by Richard Fitzpatrick (professor of physics at UT Austin):
For H2+, the theoretical prediction is 1.33e-10 m
and the experimental value is 1.06e-10 m.
For the neutral hydrogen molecule itself, all we have are fairly accurate experimental values (see next-to-last link below, which follows a general discussion of fundamental constants).
Finally, energetic amateurs have been trying to extend Bohr's semi-classical model to deal with multiple electrons. The "law of small numbers" applied to such formulas may bless them with some success where no success is deserved (i.e, there are only so many possible approximative formulas, so one of them can turn out to be fairly good even if based on the wrong concepts). Arguably, Bohr's own "old quantum theory" owed some of its early success to that kind of luck too, at least in part...
I just stumbled on one such effort as I was researching this post. I am linking to that obscure site although I did not spend much time reviewing it (I do feel quite uncomfortable with some of the author's remarks). See the last link below as an entry point to a set of several pages which may or may not prove dubious in the end...
Source(s): http://www.nyu.edu/classes/tuckerman/honors.chem/l... http://www.numericana.com/answer/quantum.htm http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/lectur... http://www.numericana.com/answer/constants.htm#h2 http://www7b.biglobe.ne.jp/~kcy05t/bonds.html - ?Lv 45 years ago
With a speedometer, you in simple terms choose for a sensor hooked as much as a timer and demonstrate, and voila! on the spot velocity readout. An odometer, although, needs to recollect distance, even after the meter has been became off for an afternoon or a week. additionally, that is extremely probably that the person will choose for the capacity to reset a visit distance meter. Now, the layout demands extra buttons, memory, backup battery, bigger demonstrate, and electric powered circuitry. So, the hardship and price quickly will develop with the addition of an odometer while in comparison with a speedometer. yet another component is secure practices and the regulation. often, you decide on for a speedometer to knowingly ward off a rushing value ticket. you do no longer choose for an odometer to ward off any tickets in any respect. So, an odometer is intrinsically much less functional than a speedometer. in spite of everything those excuses for the e-motorcycle manufacturers, I in simple terms connect a affordable $10 Walmart speedometer/odometer on my powered motorcycle and contact it an afternoon. LOL