Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Kiran C asked in Social ScienceEconomics · 1 decade ago

Of the five, what is contributing the most to the current slowness in the economy?

1) It’s the collapse of U.S. consumer wealth.

U.S. housing values have collapsed back to 2002 levels. That decline has wiped out $6.5-trillion in household wealth. When wealth declines, people spend less. (Precisely how much less is a matter of controversy but if the denominator is $6.5-trillion, even a very conservative estimate produces a nasty shock.)

2) It’s the de-leveraging, stupid.

Back in the 1990s and 2000s, U.S. consumers spent almost 100% of their incomes. Today they save over 6%. Good for them. They are paying down debt: At the peak of the boom, U.S. households spent $18.85 of every $100 of income to service debt. By the end of 2010, they were spending only $16.64 on debt service. Again, good for them. But as they save, they reduce demand for goods and services and for the labour of those who produce and sell those goods and services.

3) It’s gas prices.

The rule of thumb used by economic forecasters is that a one-cent increase in gasoline prices takes a billion dollars out of the pockets of U.S. consumers. A gallon of gas in the United States costs on average about $3.85, up more than $1 from a year ago.

4) It’s the crisis in local government.

U.S. states and localities raised spending dramatically in the first decade of the 21st century, largely to pay for Medicaid, the health program for the poor whose costs are divided between states and the federal government. State and local governments rely heavily on sales taxes (vulnerable to recessions) and property taxes (vulnerable to housing-price declines). Finally, unlike Canadian provinces, 49 of the 50 states are constitutionally obliged to balance their budgets. They can and do finagle that requirement a little, but only up to a point. About one-third of the 2009 Obama economic stimulus was forwarded to the states to help them through the crisis, but that money has been used. Result: States and localities are now raising taxes and laying off workers some 467,000 workers over the past two years. Forecasters project another 250,000 or so additional local-government layoffs in the next 12 months. And it is estimated that each government job lost costs another 1.3 private sector jobs as that worker’s pay ceases to circulate through the economy.

5) It’s Washington, too.

Blame both Democrats and Republicans. The Obama health plan will raise the cost of each worker effective 2014. Fear of those additional costs surely deters some hiring now. Meanwhile, Republicans are threatening to force a default on U.S. federal contracts, debts and other obligations unless they get their way on the federal budget plan. Fear that the Republicans may not be bluffing or that they may inadvertently trigger a crisis even if they are bluffing must also weigh on markets and hiring.

http://www.frumforum.com/no-quick-cure-for-america...

3 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    lack of demand and lack of jobs

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I would choose number three Gas prices as the economy seemed to be gaining a bit until the gas prices shot up bringing the economy to a halt.

    Remember it was the cost of fuel that spearheaded the recession in the first place the housing crash was secondary to the removal of cash from the economy that went into the gas tanks.

    The cost of fuel has an immediate effect on the economy and all consumer products.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    i'm extra apprehensive with regards to the "legalized playing" that is going down on Wall highway! people who speculate on currencies or commerce particularly training of materials (margin investors) are extremely playing that they comprehend extra effective than the different individuals doing an analogous subject. casino playing is a blended bag. It does tend to act as a regressive tax when you consider that many unfavorable human beings gamble (the lottery could be worse however!). on the different hand, portion of the clarification the U. S. is interior the mess that's in is by using the super government debt. Casinos advance sales for the government which pays for clever issues, and with out sales from casino playing, governments could bypass even deeper into debt, contributing to the financial downturn. yet I agree that casinos are in all threat not the excellent thank you to advance sales.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.