US government response when the Chinese communist government nationalizes US corporate holdings in that China?

No, they might desire to nationalize the corrupt firms and banks, yet not wall highway. that's what a perfect economist named MAx Keiser mentioned the government would desire to do. Max Keiser envisioned the fall down of Freddy would and Fannie Mack, wisely envisioned that sub-top loan-subsidized securities would be the reason for recession by utilising 2008, and he wisely envisioned the autumn of Iceland's economic equipment. His answer became to nationalize banks like JP Morgan Chase and another ones that have been being run by utilising corrupt people basically seeking to learn. yet, i think of Wall highway would desire to be regulated much extra quite then nationalized. yet, firms and banks profiting with the aid of fact of corrupt interest would desire to be nationalized. @ all and sundry. government did reason it in terms of de-regulation however the prosperous have been the actual culprits, so your answer is to de-regulate it to remedy it and shop government from making rules that ensures the prosperous play by utilising the policies? So then you rather are patently asserting the answer to our concern is de-regulation while it became de-regulation that led to the priority? Bush de-regulated the economic equipment and government wasn't in touch so get your info straight away.

the u.s will probably use terorism as it usually does. but why are you complaining about Cuba, and Chavez. the u.s and nato went into Libya, murdered thousands of people, and froze all of Libya's bank accounts, meaning that u.s, canadian, and european bankers stole billions from the Libyan people. why dont you complain about that? why's the corporate media silent about that?

"What if" thinking isn't healthy. But just being crazy, if that happens then maybe we could tell them to forget about our ever paying back that $1.3 trillion debt.