Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Adenocarcinoma in situ....please only if you know the answer to this..?

Is this precancer or stage 0 cancer? I've seen it on internet both ways. I know what it is, but wonder why there's no definite agreement in the medical field as to which it really is.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Adenocarcinoma in situ (which is a precancer) is the immediate precursor of adenocarcinoma (a cancer). You could certainly argue that stage 0 is a confusing term, but precancer and stage 0 are synonymous.

    ETA: @Denise

    I think we are in agreement here too :-) It is just a semantic issue. To (most) doctors, a cancer is something that has the capability to metastasise. An in-situ cancer does not have this capability, which is why I prefer to classify it as a pre-cancer. I feel that this distinction is very important in the communication with the patients/lay people. It makes it easier to understand, that if the in situ cancer is gone, there is no way that a metastasis from it will appear later in their lives. But from a patient management perspective the cancer in-situ is an important entity, and I agree that it useful (and correct) to register it. And this registration is also recommended by UICC and WHO, so you are right in reprimanding the doctors you work with.

    ETA2:

    - Hey look; A wonderful poem from Spree.

    - He gets a thumbs up from me.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Doctors only use the term “precancer” with their patients.

    Adenocarcinoma in situ is a non-invasive cancer, but it is cancer and it is stage 0.

    If this was in the breast chemo would still be recommended.

    A “precancer” would be a dysplasia or something along those lines.

    EDIT: Whoops. I just read the previous answers and I have to say JLI is a pathologist and I cannot recall if we have ever disagreed. Maybe he can elaborate.

    Although I understand where he is coming from, I have this argument all the time with doctors who do not want to do their TNMs so this is my standard stance on the subject in addition to the fact most CIS cases are reportable, but that means nothing to you I know.

    Source(s): I am a cancer registrar.
  • 9 years ago

    Stage 0 cancer is pre-cancer

  • 9 years ago

    I would not go to bat against Denise and pathologist JLI.

    - - -

    Far be it from me to disagree.

    Momma didn't raise no dummies like Spree.

    T0 N0 M0 is what it be.

    Call it what you will and feel free.

    How this transfers to survival odds

    is what matters to me.

    Source(s): MD Medical Oncologist and Hematologist - a cancer and blood specialist doctor - with twenty years experience
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.