Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 9 years ago

Do we need a voter's revolution?

We have been firing the individual candidates for years without any real change in the type of candidates we get. Do you think the parties care that the faces and names change? The individuals get their "marching orders" from the main parties. The two main parties seem more concerned with gathering more and more money and power to themselves. They are clearly more interested in serving their corporate overlords and themselves than the American people. In my opinion, we need campaign finance reform, shorter election cycles and term limits. Neither party will ever do any of these things. They will never self correct. It is also clear that both parties are failing to represent their own constituents. President Obama just recently stated he is for gay marriage (I don't think he actually is), but he doesn't have to be for it because gays will never vote for Republicans en masse; but it's getting close to election time and I think he came out for it to make sure that the LGBT community didn't just stay home on election day. During the Bush administration Republicans held both houses as well as the executive branch, but they did nothing for the pro-life movement; again because they don't have to. The religious right will never vote for Democrats. They think they have us locked in, so why do anything for the voters you will never lose? Where is the anti-war movement liberals? Republicans run up deficits just like the Democrats. Both parties raise as much money from Wall Street as the other; and let's just call that what it is: bribery. I'm not saying that businesses don't deserve a voice in our Republic, but they don't deserve such a loud voice that they drown out the voice of the common man. We were meant to be a government for the people by the people; which is supposed to mean all of us, not just the few. The "leaders" we have right now just keep us angry, scared and divided. Real leaders are supposed to unite people, lift them up, take responsibility for their actions and give credit where credit is due. The people we have now are no more than thespians playing a role with their plastic smiles and talking points. What kind of leader needs handlers or has others tell them what to say? They would have us believe that the people on the opposite side of the political spectrum are the enemy, but in reality they are our fellow Americans; our family members and friends. Surely you don't think they don't deserve a voice in our government because they have different beliefs than yourself? There is no "them"...it's just us, and that is nothing to fear. There is no defeating liberals, just like there is no defeating conservatives; there are new ones being born everyday. Also, if one side or the other did somehow get everything they want, we would no longer be the UNITED States of America. Half the country would be disenfranchised. We all have to give a little to receive much more. Democracy is compromise. If you think you should get everything you want then you need to grow up because you are being childish. We have a lot of problems in this country and it doesn't appear that either party has what it takes to correct our course. In fact, they appear to be the main problem. So, how do we fix it? In the end, our representatives work for us. A good boss knows when to fire a bad employee. If one looks at the Tea Party movement and the Occupy Wall Street crowd they both point to the fact that Americans are fed up across the political spectrum. Common wisdom says that voting for anyone other than the two main parties is wasting your vote, and who wants to do that? I say that voting for either main party is a wasted vote. What if we had a voters revolution? There are many other parties. Liberals could vote for members of the Green Party, Socialist Party or the Peace and Freedom Party. Conservative could vote for the Libertarian Party, the Constitution Party or we could make the Tea Party a more legitimate party. There are many more to choose from. What would happen if we did this is the liberal parties would have to compete for liberal votes; thus forcing those parties to actually be liberal, and the conservative parties would have to compete for conservative votes; thus forcing those parties to actually be conservative. This would also give us more choices for President because as all of these parties grew they would all put forward candidates. Also, we have a lot of sailors, Marines, soldiers and Airmen and women returning home, and they are going to need jobs. Who better to run for office in these minority parties? This is the best answer to our problems that I can come up with. So, what do you guys think? Possible, impossible? If you have a better idea I would love to hear it. We can't just wait for someone to save us. We have to save ourselves. There is no knight in shining armor. No "political messiah".

Update:

In the end all we have to do is change the way we vote! Voter's revolution anyone?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes, we can!!!

    All of our Socioeconomical Problems are Caused by 536 Elite, Privileged, Professional, Permanent, Political RULING Class Members in Washington DC, that have TOO Much Control and Power, in which Corruption is the Currency that is RUNNING and RUINING our Country….

    Contact the MEDIA and Government Representatives, Federal, State and LOCAL and DEMAND these 5 SIMPLE STEPS:

    1) Require States to Pay the Salary, Retirement, Travel and Living Expenses, and Staffing Needs of their own US Senators and Representatives in the House. (They could not set their own pay and benefits that way and be Beholden to those that Elected them, not Washington, DC Special Interests)

    2) Legislators can NEVER vote to "Exempt" themselves from any Law they Pass. For Example, healthcare and Insider Trading (both of which they exempted members of Congress from having to comply)

    3) Same Term Limits as the President. If you sit out a Term and Run again and your Constituency wants you back you can do 2 more Terms, then sit again. It will Stop Politicians from Making it a Career Choice, rather than Public Service.

    4) Turn over Control and Funding of the Dept. of Ed, EPA, Dept of Commerce, Health and Social Services, Land Management, Parks, etc, Back to the States to Operate as they deem appropriate for their Respective States. IF Congress did not have CONTROL of Purse Strings, they would not be such a BIG, Corrupt Target for Lobbyists and Contributors.

    5) Lastly, Citizens and Corporations can ONLY donate to the Campaign of Individuals that Represent the District in which you LIVE and/or Work. Why should Liberal Unions in New York be Giving Millions of Dollars to a Democratic Senator for Alaska? ONLY one Reason and it's NOT Honorable.

    These simple fixes would change our whole way of "Operating." It would inspire Leadership Rather than Control. It would save $100's of Billions of $$$ in pet projects and Destroyed Wealth during elections. And eliminate the "necessity" to bribe Congress with Lobbyists to get anything done. Gridlock would not be an issue, because they would not be thinking about their own personal future, rather, doing what is required to help the most Americans.

    These Changes would allow for We The People to have an opportunity to run for Office and Represent our Neighbor again.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    A person like yourself i no by how u asked this question would benefit by reading Jesse Ventura bood DemoCRIPS and ReBLOODLICANS.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.